Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Gas/Oil Premix Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 01-21-2010, 07:06 AM
  #2151  
Registered
 
EricMeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Or DIY SHAM-WOW
EricMeyer is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 07:19 AM
  #2152  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That Golden Spectra has really powerful fumes ...
robrecht is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 08:49 AM
  #2153  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Ok. I get it.
Olddragger
olddragger is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 09:17 AM
  #2154  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
Not really premix related but some interesting comments on an analysis by Blackstone of MMO.

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...41#Post1750241
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 09:26 AM
  #2155  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I would never add MMO to the oil. Well, maybe if I wanted to clean some carbon by running it through the oil for about 20 minutes of hard driving then replacing the oil. Then again, I would just use seafoam. Everyone loves seafoam.
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 09:42 AM
  #2156  
Mazda Salesman!
iTrader: (1)
 
MazDangerous86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vestavia Hills, Alabama
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roflmfao @EricMeyer
MazDangerous86 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 09:54 AM
  #2157  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
TX

I want some of what Eric is smoking and/or drinking


Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Not really premix related but some interesting comments on an analysis by Blackstone of MMO.

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...41#Post1750241
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 10:51 AM
  #2158  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
What a ******* ego!...
ASH8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 11:23 AM
  #2159  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got a big ego
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:33 PM
  #2160  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
Okay, let's talk some more. In searching about MMO I have found that IMO it is not a good choice as a premix. However, some more searching has also led me to believe that the Lucas UCL I use is probably not the best option either due to its heavy cleaning abilities.

I started the UCL because with the other straight 2 stroke oils in the SOHN reservoir and the gas tank I was getting a lot of smoke (no cat). When I started using the Lucas UCL, the smoke stopped (at least after warm up. it still does the white smoke when cold). I haven't really had any issues with the UCL and other 8 owners have commented on how smooth my cars runs. But........ feeling doesn't mean crap. Without pulling the motor apart there is no way of telling how much lubrication is getting to the center of the Apex seal.

I came across some Lucas 2 synthetic 2 stroke oil and I am probably going to ditch the Lucas UCL and use this in my tank instead since 2 stroke oils are designed specifically for gas use (I use Amsoil in my SOHN Reservoir).

What are your thoughts on ratio? I know the rule of thumb is generally 1/2oz - 1oz per gallon but lets talk about the ratio's on the back of the bottle. I am thinking at least 1oz per gallon.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 01-21-2010 at 03:38 PM.
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:40 PM
  #2161  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would run 1/2 oz per gallon for the first two tanks then run 1 oz per gallon on the next couple tanks. See if there are any noticeable differences, good or bad, and make an educated decision. If you go with 1 - 1 1/2 oz per gallon, you may want to run no premix once every ten fill ups to ensure the ratio doesn't slowly crawl upward.

BTW, theres a group buy for a case of Idemitsu. Looks like it will be around $55 + Shipping for the case. Might as well just buy that. Then you could run Lucas UCL once a month to help combat carbon buildup.
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:50 PM
  #2162  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
I am running a clean tank of gas through with a bottle of Techron (thanks to some tech from REDRX3RX8) every three or four tanks of gas to clean things up. I should also note that I only use Shell 93 octane gas.

Does anyone know if gas cane be tested? I always wonder if what is advertised is in the tank?
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 04:06 PM
  #2163  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't use that bottle of Techron so often. Maybe once a month tops. The bottled fuel system cleaners are known to cause damage if used too often. I tend to stay away from them.

I will premix 9/10 times. That one time I do not premix, I will run just gas. Once every 3-6 months, that 1 tank of just gas becomes gas + seafoam or BG 44k. I think less is more when it comes to "cleaners". Lubricious cleaners on the other hand I will use all the time. MMO is exactly that, or at least I think it is. Even if it is not, I am leaving MMO and moving on to better premixes I'm also looking into FP+ and other cleaners to mix with Idemitsu.
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 04:10 PM
  #2164  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
Yeah generally every fourth tank or so, it should work out to once a month or so. I have yet to try the FP+ stuff.
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 04:30 PM
  #2165  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm curious about FP+ and whether it works or not.
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 05:23 PM
  #2166  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
MikeTyson8MyKids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by EricMeyer
-Seafoam works.
This is probably one of the more important statements in this thread.

There is lots of conjecture in this thread about pre-mix, "lubricious cleaners", pure cleaners, the mythical powers of Marvel Mystery Oil, etc.

Lets just say what we do know:

1) Premix (real low ash 2-stroke oil) reduces wear and increases compression (better sealing). This is known.
2) Running stuff (Techron, Seafoam in the tank, etc) that is specifically a chemical cleaner is going to attack the oil films in the chambers. This is going to mean a higher rate of wear.
3) The combustion process produces carbon (especially when we burn crank case oil). All there is to it. The Renesis, by nature, tends to hold on to carbon more than other IC engines. This can be really bad (seals damaged), or if its mild...just a slightly sticky seal or reduction in efficiency.
4) Keep the crank oil fresh! Needs no explanation.

So, just going off of these 4 things brings me to what I think is probably one of the more important statements in this monster of a thread...seafoam works.

Instead of constantly running some "Mystery Oil" all the time, how about just running premix that is known to be low ash.

Then keep the carbon in check, do a seafoam treatment as normal maintenance. How often is up to the user and the application. At least you won't be running mystery oils and cleaners that are probably be doing more harm than good.

These engines just plain wear out just like any other engine, so its not like anyone is going to find the magic cure to make one go forever.
MikeTyson8MyKids is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 05:24 PM
  #2167  
Not yet famous
iTrader: (7)
 
BRODA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by EricMeyer
Or DIY SHAM-WOW
I usually avoid this thread, but I am so glad I popped in today. Simply hilarious.
BRODA is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 05:34 PM
  #2168  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by MikeTyson8MyKids
This is probably one of the more important statements in this thread.

There is lots of conjecture in this thread about pre-mix, "lubricious cleaners", pure cleaners, the mythical powers of Marvel Mystery Oil, etc.

Lets just say what we do know:

1) Premix (real low ash 2-stroke oil) reduces wear and increases compression (better sealing). This is known.
2) Running stuff (Techron, Seafoam in the tank, etc) that is specifically a chemical cleaner is going to attack the oil films in the chambers. This is going to mean a higher rate of wear.
3) The combustion process produces carbon (especially when we burn crank case oil). All there is to it. The Renesis, by nature, tends to hold on to carbon more than other IC engines. This can be really bad (seals damaged), or if its mild...just a slightly sticky seal or reduction in efficiency.
4) Keep the crank oil fresh! Needs no explanation.

So, just going off of these 4 things brings me to what I think is probably one of the more important statements in this monster of a thread...seafoam works.

Instead of constantly running some "Mystery Oil" all the time, how about just running premix that is known to be low ash.

Then keep the carbon in check, do a seafoam treatment as normal maintenance. How often is up to the user and the application. At least you won't be running mystery oils and cleaners that are probably be doing more harm than good.

These engines just plain wear out just like any other engine, so its not like anyone is going to find the magic cure to make one go forever.

I agree. However, I would like to at least make to 100,000 miles on one engine instead of taking three to get there so I like to discuss everything to death. plus i like to keep thsi stuff fresh because most new guys will not read 100 pages of BS to get an answer.

It may seem to many that this stuff is old news but I still talk to guys new and old that still do not have a good understanding of premixing or lubrication in general. Just when I think I have read everything, I find a little knowledge I was unaware of
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 06:58 PM
  #2169  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Okay, let's talk some more. In searching about MMO I have found that IMO it is not a good choice as a premix. However, some more searching has also led me to believe that the Lucas UCL I use is probably not the best option either due to its heavy cleaning abilities.
What? After all that scientific research you did, you're now no longer convinced of your "tune-up in a bottle" that "increases power" and "decreases fuel consumption." I'm flabbergasted, severely disillusioned, speechless, bewildered, don't know where to turn any more.

What have you read about it's "heavy cleaning abilities" that concerns you?
robrecht is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 09:04 PM
  #2170  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anything that is primarily a solvent is most likely a poor premix for the 8 as it is at least thinning the oil films which is bad. Although I don't have anything negative to say about MMO, after much debate in this thread, I will be switching to a synthetic, low ash premix, most likely idemitsu or protek r from pettit. I will most likely use MMO or FP+ to help combat carbon. At what ratio I mix idemitsu and the tbd carbon cleaner is another debate.
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 10:05 PM
  #2171  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by robrecht
What? After all that scientific research you did, you're now no longer convinced of your "tune-up in a bottle" that "increases power" and "decreases fuel consumption." I'm flabbergasted, severely disillusioned, speechless, bewildered, don't know where to turn any more.

What have you read about it's "heavy cleaning abilities" that concerns you?

Tune up in a bottle? I think you are referring to Lucas. Yes well, not so much on Lucas in particular but on MMO specifically and other "additives". Without drudging all the crap up (you can do your own research), all I can say is basically none of them hold a candle to a good 2 stroke from a lubrication and ash standpoint so what is the point of running them as a premix?

For me specifically because I have a new motor that has oil changes every 3k (usually less) and has clean 2 stroke going in VIA SOHN, and I run only Shell 93 octane. So my motor should be plenty clean inside and out.
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-21-2010, 10:08 PM
  #2172  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by jmc23200
Anything that is primarily a solvent is most likely a poor premix for the 8 as it is at least thinning the oil films which is bad. Although I don't have anything negative to say about MMO, after much debate in this thread, I will be switching to a synthetic, low ash premix, most likely idemitsu or protek r from pettit. I will most likely use MMO or FP+ to help combat carbon. At what ratio I mix idemitsu and the tbd carbon cleaner is another debate.
Yeah basically that is my point. As for MMO, If you have a dirty engine, run MMO for a few minutes drive cycle in the oil and then do a drain, fill, drain fill. But honestly why use MMO when Amsoil, autorx, etc. have products for this that are not a mystery.
9krpmrx8 is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 06:49 AM
  #2173  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Tune up in a bottle? I think you are referring to Lucas. Yes well, not so much on Lucas in particular but on MMO specifically and other "additives". Without drudging all the crap up (you can do your own research), all I can say is basically none of them hold a candle to a good 2 stroke from a lubrication and ash standpoint so what is the point of running them as a premix?

For me specifically because I have a new motor that has oil changes every 3k (usually less) and has clean 2 stroke going in VIA SOHN, and I run only Shell 93 octane. So my motor should be plenty clean inside and out.
Yes, I am referring to your old Lucas UCL. Right on the bottle, they call it "Tune-Up in a Bottle."

As mentioned in the other thread, the Renesis is more prone to carbon build-up than older rotaries because of the side exhaust ports, especially in daily driving. That's why some here look for a premix, eg, FP+ or Lucas UCL or even MMO, that can help in preventing or even breaking down carbon. I wouldn't assume that 1.5 oz/gal of premix, in addition to your working OMP, and you say it is maybe working too hard, will help with carbon build-up, especially around the side seals. As Stealth has pointed out, low ash or ashless refers only to the additive package and says nothing about carbon from the combustion (or incomplete combusion) process. From what I've read here, you're usually talking about a trade off between ashless and less protection and low ash and more protection.

Another thought. I think you're catless, but I don't recall if you have an AP. Without the cat, why not also lean out your AFRs ratios rather than just adding so much premix? That will also give you more power, unlike your old Lucas UCL, which only claimed to do so.

Last edited by robrecht; 01-22-2010 at 06:53 AM.
robrecht is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 08:41 AM
  #2174  
Registered
 
jmc23200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha BG 44K ad at the bottom of the thread. Epic win for BG 44K, good product

Anyway, I wonder what the minimum amount of cleaner(MMO, FP+, UCL) is that you can add to the gas and still have it work. Since they are all primarily solvents/cleaners, less may be more in this case. Would mixing 1-3oz of MMO/FP+/UCL with 5-7oz Idemitsu actually do anything? Hmmmm, where can I find some carbon covered parts to test? Any thoughts?
jmc23200 is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 08:55 AM
  #2175  
Nature vs. Nurture
iTrader: (5)
 
ganseg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking of putting in new plugs and running a mix of Amsoil Saber Pro and FP Plus. I could see if carbon on the plugs is lessened as a proxy for corbon on the engine walls. What do you think?
ganseg is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Gas/Oil Premix Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.