Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Long Path, Interesting Discovery

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-18-2015, 09:38 PM
  #1  
Moder8
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
04Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 2,578
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Long Path, Interesting Discovery

Background.
I got to where I am through this thread https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tro...-610-a-256168/

Both ECUs have been "refurbished". By that I mean they were tested, some parts were considered lacking (mainly transistor packs) and they were replaced. They are now reflashed and closed back up. All the testing was done with the factory tune, with drive cycles. I am starting to hate drive cycles.

Really Odd Observation:
When I put the original ECU back in the first time, after the refurbish, before a reflash, and got the car running, I noticed the range and the cumulative MPG started to climb on my ultra gauge. I did not think much of it. When I put in the used and reflashed ECU, it was still climbing. I have a pretty set commute, with back roads and constant speeds. The highest numbers I see are a 45 mph level section. With these ECUs, the highs are now in the 28 to 30 range (2 to 3 above a month ago). Today I had a 28, going into a head wind, with the AC on. And, I drive this route with cruise control on to foot based variations are unlikely.

I started thinking about what these replaced transistors could be doing and came up with firing coils, firing fuel injectors and important things like that. And the question becomes, does it makes sense that a new set of control devices would do a cleaner and more precise job of switching power than an 11 year old set that has driven the car 138,000 miles? And, if they did, is it worth a 10% or greater increase in MPG?

And yeah, I think I am getting the mileage. The average from last 8 moths was what was starting to rise. So was the miles projected from each tank (sum of trip odo plus distance to empty rises throughout the tank).

Am I missing something?

I have since reset the *** MPG to precisely check mileage across a few tanks. But it is tracking what I expect so far. I also went back to my custom tune as I have a track day coming up and want to get some cycles in place. (I may go back to factory after the event for more testing) Indications are this one is as good or better than the factory tune, and was the one responsible for the data prior to a month ago.

Comments? Do we even care?
Old 03-20-2015, 07:38 AM
  #2  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
you should make it clear that it's a 2004 model, which there were numerous PCM revisions that year ...
Old 03-20-2015, 07:52 AM
  #3  
Moder8
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
04Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 2,578
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Yes, it is an 04. I did not know about PCM revisions... The depending on how you read serial numbers on them, the two I have are not that far apart. Any idea what the revisions were for?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SBGarage
Group Buy Center
1
09-12-2015 08:18 PM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
09-10-2015 09:29 AM
carid
Vendor Classifieds
0
09-10-2015 09:26 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Long Path, Interesting Discovery



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM.