Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Transmission Oil Life: Royal Purple versus Redline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-05-2006 | 05:01 PM
  #1  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Transmission Oil Life: Royal Purple versus Redline

Hey folks,
I'm due for my 30k service, so I figured it'd be a good time to put in some better oil into the transmission. I was going to put Redline in, but then a friend with an M3 heard of some folks with other M3s having some issues with Redline. Things would feel great at first, but then after a few thousand miles, the shift quality would regress.

Anyone here have a similar experience? For those that have put in RP or RL, could tell us how many miles you have and if you still think the shift quality is improved?

Thanks!

~ Matt
Old 12-05-2006 | 05:57 PM
  #2  
Mazda-Rati's Avatar
the WANKEL made me do it
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I've been using Redline for the last 10K miles (34K on the car) and can't say I've noticed any difference. I was thinking of trying RP because my 8, when cold, will grind if I don't shift REALLY soft. Once the car warms it shifts smooth though.
Old 12-05-2006 | 06:01 PM
  #3  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by Mazda-Rati
I've been using Redline for the last 10K miles (34K on the car) and can't say I've noticed any difference. I was thinking of trying RP because my 8, when cold, will grind if I don't shift REALLY soft. Once the car warms it shifts smooth though.
So, what you are saying is that before putting the Redline oil in, and after putting the Redline oil in, it felt the same and has continued to feel the same? (this is what I think you are saying)

Or that for the entire 10K that you've had the Redline, it hasn't changed, however, there was a difference from before putting the Redline in, to after.


Thanks for your input!

~ Matt
Old 12-05-2006 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
just hit 30k on rp in the tran and diff... time to change it...

the stuff makes a huge difference in the trans... for the better..

as to rl vs rp... a cant believe there is much difference..

beers
Old 12-05-2006 | 06:04 PM
  #5  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by swoope
just hit 30k on rp in the tran and diff... time to change it...

the stuff makes a huge difference in the trans... for the better..

as to rl vs rp... a cant believe there is much difference..

beers
Cool, so you've put on 30k miles with Royal Purple in your transmission and it has been consistant for the entire time? That's good to know. Thanks!

~ Matt
Old 12-05-2006 | 06:12 PM
  #6  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Vaillant
Cool, so you've put on 30k miles with Royal Purple in your transmission and it has been consistant for the entire time? That's good to know. Thanks!

~ Matt
yep.

beers
Old 12-05-2006 | 06:49 PM
  #7  
tmak26b's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
I have used them both for various cars, no big difference.
Old 12-05-2006 | 07:26 PM
  #8  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Just switched to Redline this weekend. It seems that when cold, my car doesn't like going into 1st when moving, but once the tranny is warmed up the shift quality is fantastic. I use straight MT-90, so maybe going with a MT-90/MTL mix is better for shifting when cold.

Last edited by LionZoo; 12-05-2006 at 07:31 PM.
Old 12-06-2006 | 07:15 AM
  #9  
takahashi j's Avatar
shovin' into overdrive...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Just switched to Redline this weekend. It seems that when cold, my car doesn't like going into 1st when moving, but once the tranny is warmed up the shift quality is fantastic. I use straight MT-90, so maybe going with a MT-90/MTL mix is better for shifting when cold.
I have been using redline MT-90 for the last 25k miles and i have noticed the same. In the morning, when the tranny fluid is cold, it's hard to shift into gear. I did not notice the hard shift with the OEM tranny fluid.

Originally Posted by swoope
just hit 30k on rp in the tran and diff... time to change it...

the stuff makes a huge difference in the trans... for the better..

as to rl vs rp... a cant believe there is much difference..

beers
swoope, does the same thing happen for RP when the fluids arent warmed up, and are you using the RP Syncromax in your tranny?
Old 12-06-2006 | 07:41 AM
  #10  
bsteimel's Avatar
Nice !!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 432
Likes: 3
From: Kennett Square, PA
I have used amsoil in many different cars and am really happy with it, I've got it ready to go in when I get around to doing it. I researched redline, RP and amsoil before deciding on amsoil. Redline it seemed many people had hard shifting when it was cold. I haven't heard any complaints about RP. Since my past experience with amsoil is steller i decided to go with them. I used it in the engine as well (please lets not start a synthetic engine oil thread).

What about oil weights? In the 2004 manual for the LSD they recommended 75w90 and the same for the trans both gl-5 spec. I went to the mazda dealer and was asking about the mazda oils (which they use for every mazda nothing special about it) and they put 80w90 in the lsd and 75w90 in the trans still both gl-5 spec. What weights do people use in the trans and diff?
Old 12-06-2006 | 10:50 AM
  #11  
dgrx8's Avatar
FN GR8
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 1
From: Miami
yeah... same problem here w/ my redline. shifting when cold always grinds. getting into 3rd gear is really nasty in the morning for me & keep in mind i live in florida. i must say though that when it warms up it feels great!
Old 12-06-2006 | 01:18 PM
  #12  
ezrider55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I have had RedLine in for 25K and will put it in again. Made a big differance vs OEM. You do have to shift ez the first few miles when it is cold but it is worth the cost. Have not used RP but everyone seems to think they are about the same.
Old 12-06-2006 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
I've been using Red Line in gearbox and diff for about 10,000 miles. I did notice an improvement over the stock fluids, although it wasn't earth-shattering. The Red Line seems to provide a little more "cushion", is about as well as I can describe it. You need to slow down the shift just a tad, and then it rewards you with a nice smoothness. It does seem to get a little gooey when cold though it rarely goes below freezing here so it's not a big problem. If I were in a cold climate I'd probably go with the MTL or a mix.

I'm always surprised by the number of people who have trouble getting into 3rd. On my box, the 2-3 shift is absolutely the smoothest and fastest on the box, and 4-3 is good. Going into 4th usually gives a bit of a whine for me though. Crazy how even mass-produced things with thousandth-inch tolerances can still end up so different.
Old 12-06-2006 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
Mazda-Rati's Avatar
the WANKEL made me do it
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Vaillant
So, what you are saying is that before putting the Redline oil in, and after putting the Redline oil in, it felt the same and has continued to feel the same? (this is what I think you are saying)
It feels the same and continues to feel the same from the stock fluids, but needs to be rev matched when shifting to keep it from grinding when cold. The only BIG differnece is the 2 -3 shift where it shifts much smoother.
Old 12-07-2006 | 12:28 PM
  #15  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by Mazda-Rati
It feels the same and continues to feel the same from the stock fluids, but needs to be rev matched when shifting to keep it from grinding when cold. The only BIG differnece is the 2 -3 shift where it shifts much smoother.
Cool, thanks for the clarification.
Old 12-07-2006 | 12:41 PM
  #16  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
they are both quality oils, trying to make a determination on which is better for every day street use is pointless exercise in anality

fwiw, I ran Redline in numerous BMWs (street & competition) without issue, if there is an issue it was most likely from using the wrong grade/type oil for the application
Old 12-07-2006 | 05:48 PM
  #17  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
they are both quality oils, trying to make a determination on which is better for every day street use is pointless exercise in anality

fwiw, I ran Redline in numerous BMWs (street & competition) without issue, if there is an issue it was most likely from using the wrong grade/type oil for the application
While I would think there wouldn't be much of a difference, there's already been one (cold transmission shift difficulties with Redline) that's come out. More than anything, though, I was hoping to find out after 10k, 20k, or more miles, how the two compare in terms of shift quality.

~ Matt
Old 12-08-2006 | 02:03 PM
  #18  
naoki's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
I was also comparing (1) RP Max Gear, (2) Redline MT90 and (3) Amsoil. Here is the specs I gathered.

viscosity@100C cSt: (1) 21 (2) 15.6 (3) 14.7
viscosity@40C cSt: (1) 144.5 (2) 90 (3) 84.5
Viscosity Index: (1) ? (2) 185 (3) 177
Brookfield Viscosity@-40C: (1) ? (2) 320 (3) 43.6
Flashpoint (F) (1) 430 (2) 465 (3) 410
Pour Point (F) (1) -40 (2) - 49 (3) -47

I don't know the differences among the "types" of viscosity. Can anyone explain the differences? There seems to be quite a bit of differences even though all of them are rated as 75W-90. Since it can become chilly around here in Alaska (occasional -40 to -50F), Amsoil (or redline) seems to be the best for me (pour point of RP is a little higher than amsoil or redline). For the rear differential fluid, Amsoil has the lowest pour point (-60F).

Last edited by naoki; 12-08-2006 at 02:05 PM.
Old 12-08-2006 | 02:14 PM
  #19  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Anyone have any real evidence to show that the LSD additives in the Royal Purple are harmful to syncros? I have heard this argument, but no case studies or anything.

This would be one thing that could sway me more towards the Redline.
Old 12-09-2006 | 01:47 AM
  #20  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
Anyone have any real evidence to show that the LSD additives in the Royal Purple are harmful to syncros? I have heard this argument, but no case studies or anything.

This would be one thing that could sway me more towards the Redline.
30 k miles no problems.. but i think the problems you mention are with the lsd, not the syncros.

beers
Old 12-09-2006 | 10:06 AM
  #21  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
No, from what I've heard the LSD additives can be harmful to the integrity of the syncros, b/c the additives can cause the metals in the syncros to become degraded. (i.e. the soft metals of the syncros are not intended to be used with LSD additives, which seems to be gl5 stuff, wereas the gl4 stuff doesn't contain these additives). I would imagine this would be over a rather long period of time if it is true.

Last edited by Rhythmic; 12-09-2006 at 10:09 AM.
Old 12-09-2006 | 08:17 PM
  #22  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
No, from what I've heard the LSD additives can be harmful to the integrity of the syncros, b/c the additives can cause the metals in the syncros to become degraded. (i.e. the soft metals of the syncros are not intended to be used with LSD additives, which seems to be gl5 stuff, wereas the gl4 stuff doesn't contain these additives). I would imagine this would be over a rather long period of time if it is true.
sure,

ok. fine..

beers
Old 12-10-2006 | 11:49 AM
  #23  
Rotario's Avatar
Long Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
I put Redline in both my tranny (MT-90) and differential (75W90) at about 1k miles. I just changed them both a couple weekends ago (at 18k miles). Funny thing was that other than some gunk stuck to the drain plug magnet on the tranny, that fluid looked just like brand new oil coming out of a fresh container. The differential, OTOH, was very dark -- not black like used motor oil, just way darker than the tranny fluid (and yes, there was a lot of gunk stuck to its drain plug magnet as well). What does this mean? Hell if I know. I might try some Royal Purple next time around, but for now, the Redline has worked very well for me. As for hard shifts when cold, that went away completely when I put the Richard Paul shifter in. It's almost like that thing has a microchip in it that guesses what gear you want, as shifting is so effortless and easy you just almost don't even have to think about it. I really hate to sound like a Richard Paul commercial here, it's just that I get sooooooo very pissed off when I buy things that don't work, when I buy something that does work (and greatly exceeds my expectations), I have a hard time refraining from singing about it from the rooftop.
Old 12-12-2006 | 05:21 PM
  #24  
takahashi j's Avatar
shovin' into overdrive...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
No, from what I've heard the LSD additives can be harmful to the integrity of the syncros, b/c the additives can cause the metals in the syncros to become degraded. (i.e. the soft metals of the syncros are not intended to be used with LSD additives, which seems to be gl5 stuff, wereas the gl4 stuff doesn't contain these additives). I would imagine this would be over a rather long period of time if it is true.
I just purchased two quarts of royal purple max gear 75w90 which is a GL4 & GL5 compatible gear oil. I talked to a royal purple tech over the phone and he recommends the max gear for the rx-8. He told me that the max gear oil does not contain the harmful additives that other GL5 gear oils contain and is safe for the soft metals in the tranny. Additionally it retains the strength of a GL5 gear oil. Max Gear indeed...
Old 12-13-2006 | 03:17 PM
  #25  
Vaillant's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX-VIII
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
I think I'm going to go with Royal Purple. Anyone know if any chains carry it? I'm over here in California, so we've got Pep Boys and Kragen as our big chains.

~ Matt


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Transmission Oil Life: Royal Purple versus Redline



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.