Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Utilising 3rd oil injector hole?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-15-2022 | 02:06 PM
  #1  
mrgnex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 30
Likes: 3
Utilising 3rd oil injector hole?

I bought new rotor housings as part of my rebuild. I figured I would get S2 housings since they were cheaper and why not. I started looking into using the third oil injector hole seeing how there are wear marks on the center of my old housings.
The idea I came up with was to make new oil lines and have a splitter to create 6 connection points from the 4 nozzles on the OMP. I was not sure the pressure and flow would be sufficient so decided to not follow through.
However, after browsing around I found a listing of the S2 housings on RRP and they mention the center oil nozzle hole can be used. I sent a message to ask how but I have not heard yet and I am afraid I will never.
Does anyone have experience with this or have some insights?
The following users liked this post:
kevink0000 (08-15-2022)
Old 08-15-2022 | 07:01 PM
  #2  
Loki's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,007
Likes: 1,005
From: Montreal
There's no real pressure in the OMP system, it doesn't inject as much as it dribbles. If I were to do this, I would split left and right, and dedicate one line to the center. I don't think you could make anything worse, the delivery rate is still the same.

Keep in mind that the S2 system activates the 2nd EMOP only under certain conditions. Most of the time it's running on 2 injectors /rotor.
Old 08-15-2022 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 1,536
From: Y-cat-o NZ
The OMP is designed to deliver precisely the same amount of oil to each of the four injectors. The problem is that oil will take the line of least resistance, so Putting a T in any one of those lines opens up the possibility that more will flow through one than the other.

If that happens ..... save up for a rebuild cuz it wont take long.
The following users liked this post:
Loki (08-15-2022)
Old 08-15-2022 | 09:12 PM
  #4  
kevink0000's Avatar
77 cylinders, 4 rotors...
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 816
Likes: 251
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by mrgnex
I bought new rotor housings as part of my rebuild. I figured I would get S2 housings since they were cheaper and why not. I started looking into using the third oil injector hole seeing how there are wear marks on the center of my old housings.
The idea I came up with was to make new oil lines and have a splitter to create 6 connection points from the 4 nozzles on the OMP. I was not sure the pressure and flow would be sufficient so decided to not follow through.
However, after browsing around I found a listing of the S2 housings on RRP and they mention the center oil nozzle hole can be used. I sent a message to ask how but I have not heard yet and I am afraid I will never.
Does anyone have experience with this or have some insights?
I set up a current rebuild the way Loki described. I put a t between the two side injectors and just ran one line to the center from a modified s1 pump. The t is very local to the injectors with the shortest possible lines of equal length. It might favor one or the other side while running, ( and I wouldn't know it if it did) but using a static gravity test before the engine was installed, both lines flowed the same speed/rate. Under pressure both the banjo bolt valves popped at the same time, at least at the time of testing. The OMP is set to inject vastly more oil than stock. I would not try this with stock settings in my opinion. Too many unknowns. On mine, time will tell if it works and keeps working.

Last edited by kevink0000; 08-15-2022 at 09:29 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Brettus (08-15-2022)
Old 08-16-2022 | 07:28 AM
  #5  
200.mph's Avatar
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,706
Likes: 2,508
From: BALLS DEEP
mazda maniac did this years ago, had a long chat with him at dyno day
Old 08-16-2022 | 08:11 AM
  #6  
mrgnex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 30
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Loki
There's no real pressure in the OMP system, it doesn't inject as much as it dribbles. If I were to do this, I would split left and right, and dedicate one line to the center. I don't think you could make anything worse, the delivery rate is still the same.

Keep in mind that the S2 system activates the 2nd EMOP only under certain conditions. Most of the time it's running on 2 injectors /rotor.
I see. That would be interesting. Have you used this?
Also I would think just running 3 all the time would be good too instead of engineering an entire system to have it come in later.

Originally Posted by Brettus
The OMP is designed to deliver precisely the same amount of oil to each of the four injectors. The problem is that oil will take the line of least resistance, so Putting a T in any one of those lines opens up the possibility that more will flow through one than the other.

If that happens ..... save up for a rebuild cuz it wont take long.
That is exactly what I was thinking. Besides, Mazda put in two oil injectors to cool/aid as part of the side exhaust too iirc. So diverting flow to the center might counteract that too. By keeping the t/y piece close to the rotor housing and the length of both hoses the same the resistance and therefore flow could be as close as possible. But it would be hard to guess if that is sufficient.

Originally Posted by kevink0000
I set up a current rebuild the way Loki described. I put a t between the two side injectors and just ran one line to the center from a modified s1 pump. The t is very local to the injectors with the shortest possible lines of equal length. It might favor one or the other side while running, ( and I wouldn't know it if it did) but using a static gravity test before the engine was installed, both lines flowed the same speed/rate. Under pressure both the banjo bolt valves popped at the same time, at least at the time of testing. The OMP is set to inject vastly more oil than stock. I would not try this with stock settings in my opinion. Too many unknowns. On mine, time will tell if it works and keeps working.
That is very interesting! How did you increase the injection amount? I assume either through software flashing or a hardware modification of the omp pistons?
I don't see why you wouldn't recommend trying it with stock settings? It might inject less in the sides but more in the center.

​​​​​
Originally Posted by 200.mph
mazda maniac did this years ago, had a long chat with him at dyno day
​​​​​​​Do you know how he did it? And what did you chat about?


It would be an interesting experiment. I've seen plenty of housings having broken out chrome near the exhaust ports though so I don't know if taking oil away from the sides would do that any favour. On the other hand I would assume the oil is burned up before it can reach that point?
The other downside is that you would need to source 2 additional injectors. Which don't seem to be cheap.
​​
Thanks for the insights. Keep 'em coming!
Old 08-16-2022 | 07:43 PM
  #7  
kevink0000's Avatar
77 cylinders, 4 rotors...
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 816
Likes: 251
From: Arizona
There is not enough oil stock in my opinion, regardless of 2 injector or 3.

If you then have non standard plumbing with unknown results, it makes sense to add more oil for that reason alone. The factory oil amount delivered in average street driving is miniscule.


This thread may be interesting to you:

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tec...cation-268559/

Old 08-20-2022 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,869
Likes: 2,083
I was going to suggest premixing, but then remembered this is the season of the whiney can’t be bothered with it generation that would rather chance eating an engine they can’t even afford in the first place playing this sort of game. Because they’re smarter and have more resources than Mazda ever could.

ps: an S2 engine is no more reliable or longer living than an S1 engine. So why would anyone knowledgeable even attempt this? The answer is right before you.
.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 08-20-2022 at 12:15 PM.
Old 08-20-2022 | 01:08 PM
  #9  
kevink0000's Avatar
77 cylinders, 4 rotors...
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 816
Likes: 251
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I was going to suggest premixing, but then remembered this is the season of the whiney can’t be bothered with it generation that would rather chance eating an engine they can’t even afford in the first place playing this sort of game. Because they’re smarter and have more resources than Mazda ever could.

ps: an S2 engine is no more reliable or longer living than an S1 engine. So why would anyone knowledgeable even attempt this? The answer is right before you.
.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
myon
New Member Forum
35
02-01-2024 12:19 PM
toplessFC3Sman
RX-8 Discussion
19
10-07-2022 06:32 PM
0-TO-100_Real_Quick
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
08-09-2021 11:34 AM
RX-8 40th Anniversary
RX-8 Discussion
4
06-13-2021 12:28 PM
Brice-RX8
Series I Tech Garage
15
11-16-2005 08:16 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.