Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

Had Compression Test Done, seeking opinions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-30-2010 | 01:15 AM
  #1  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Had Compression Test Done, seeking opinions...

Hi All,

I recently had my car's compression tested, and wanted to get some feedback from the community.

The car is a 2004 RX8 Grand Touring 6spd (early 2003 build date), I'm the 2nd owner (possibly third, not sure) with 76k miles now. Car was tuned a couple of months ago by Jeff (MazdaManiac) and put down 171rwhp

Engine / Power Mods:
AEM CAI
Greddy SP2 Exhaust (had)
Rotary Store 80mm Resonated Midpipe w/ Highflow cat
Boost Brothers SS Headers Wrapped
BHR Ignition
COBB AP (Tuned by Jeff)

The Compression Test Results are:

Rotor 1: @ 252 RPM
6.7
6.8
7.1

Rotor 2: @ 248 RPM
6.6
7.1
7.0

I thought it was interesting that the front rotor had lower numbers versus the rear. The car still runs pretty good considering the power is on the weak side (IMO), but starting to notice its having a harder time starting up (long crank times). Fortunately only flooded once. I'm pretty particular with the maintenance as well, and avg about 16-19mpg mixed driving.

What do you all think? Is it a sign of what's to come in the possible near future? I've been tossing around the idea of going FI (Greddy Turbo kit) since I have most all the supporting mods for it (minus upgraded injectors and fuel pump). But might not be a good idea to build upon this motor if it's weak.

Thanks in advance!
Old 10-31-2010 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Bump... Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Old 11-01-2010 | 12:22 AM
  #3  
Jon316G's Avatar
Grasshopper
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,779
Likes: 46
From: Streetsboro, OH
Looking at the numbers normalized to 250rpm, they don't look bad for a car with 76K miles.
Couple rotor sides are at Mazda's minimum tolerance spec.
Old 11-01-2010 | 01:43 AM
  #4  
Tamas's Avatar
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 38
From: SF Bay Area, California
Well, 171 whp following the tuning IS weak, especially if you don't even have a cat. Also, 16-19 mpg in mixed driving is not good either... so FI on this engine might not be the best idea.
On the other hand, I'm not even close to being really knowledgeable about rotaries, so...
Old 11-01-2010 | 01:50 AM
  #5  
Jon316G's Avatar
Grasshopper
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,779
Likes: 46
From: Streetsboro, OH
Originally Posted by Tamas
Well, 171 whp following the tuning IS weak, especially if you don't even have a cat.
And what was your baseline dyno before the mods?
Can't tell anything without a baseline to judge from.
Weak dyno... welcome to the RX8 world...

Originally Posted by Tamas
Also, 16-19 mpg in mixed driving is not good either
Again... welcome to the RX8 world.

Originally Posted by Tamas
so FI on this engine might not be the best idea.
If you know whats best, why you asking?

Originally Posted by Tamas
On the other hand, I'm not even close to being really knowledgeable about rotaries, so...
No argument there...
Old 11-01-2010 | 02:01 AM
  #6  
Tamas's Avatar
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 38
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by Jon316G
And what was your baseline dyno before the mods?
Can't tell anything without a baseline to judge from.
You mean mine? It was 175 HP before the MM tuning. And I do have a cat. After the tuning, it was 190.

16-19 mpg in mixed driving is not very good either, but it is not unusual...

If you know whats best, why you asking?
I'm not sure I follow you here... who said I know what's best? And what am I asking?

No argument there...
Thanks for the reinforcement
Old 11-01-2010 | 02:05 AM
  #7  
Jon316G's Avatar
Grasshopper
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,779
Likes: 46
From: Streetsboro, OH
My apologies Tamas... I thought you were the OP replying to what I said.
Should have been paying more attention... was caught-up in a movie
Old 11-01-2010 | 02:42 AM
  #8  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
the motor is done.

my weak *** mazda rebuild with 60k miles on it with the old starter does better than that..

to some extent if all things are working ie coils fuel pump. compression = mpg.

beers
Old 11-01-2010 | 08:05 AM
  #9  
rotaryPilot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Europe - Greece
It seems that you are about at the Mazda’s threshold to rebuild or change motor. This however does not mean that you lack of performance. The problems start at about 600kpa or 550kpa and you are not so far away.

It would be wiser to rebuild now your engine escaping a catastrophic failure that probably will make most of your motor’s parts unusable for a rebuild.

After the rebuild you can go FI.
Old 11-02-2010 | 01:19 AM
  #10  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Thanks for all the responses everyone.

Regrettably I've never had a baseline dyno done on the car. I've only driven my own car and a stock 08 Anniversary as comparison. Sadly the anniversary actually felt just as fast if not a little faster. The 171rwhp was done with a highflow cat on a 3" resonated midpipe, so I would guess catless would've yeilded slightly higher numbers.

If an N/A build similiar to other board members like Nemesis8, or CHR can put down 210ish rwhp I may just leave it at that. Tuned 170rwhp versus 210rwhp is a big difference, hopefully enough to keep the smiles on my face after hitting the apexes on the turns.

After all the feedback I've decided to start and save for a good rebuild. I was actually considering selling the RX8 to pick up another car but don't want to have to deal with car payments or lose out on all the work done to the car. I really wish the 09-10 models were compatible with the AP tuning... That would've been ideal in my decision making.

Thanks again everyone!
Old 11-02-2010 | 01:29 AM
  #11  
tigersilhouette's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 84
Likes: 1
From: California
With all the mods will Mazda honor the engine core warranty? You're definitely within the 8 years 100,000 miles. Hope you're able to keep the 8. Also, isn't 6.9 kpa the minimum spec? If so both rotors are under spec on at least one rotor face.
Old 11-02-2010 | 01:47 AM
  #12  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Originally Posted by tigersilhouette
With all the mods will Mazda honor the engine core warranty? You're definitely within the 8 years 100,000 miles. Hope you're able to keep the 8. Also, isn't 6.9 kpa the minimum spec? If so both rotors are under spec on at least one rotor face.
Oh, I'm keeping the RX8... No worries there.

I was considering this route too, but from my understanding after talking to folks in the business, Mazda's process is pretty involved. The odds are stacked against me on this one. With the parts I have on the car it would work against me, so I'd have to convert the car back to stock to be able to stand a chance. Fortunately my car is still operating well, albeit weak so that would also work against me.

Planning for a customized rebuild so far seems to be the easier and more fruitful method so far. I can at least drive the car until I save enough money to get the engine replaced/rebuilt.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
38
05-14-2024 06:57 AM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
p8ntman442
Series I Tech Garage
3
09-22-2015 08:06 PM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
09-10-2015 09:29 AM
rxwilly8
New Member Forum
1
09-02-2015 02:42 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Had Compression Test Done, seeking opinions...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.