Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

Have An 05's Flooded?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-20-2005 | 10:33 PM
  #1  
njcs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Have An 05's Flooded?

Does anybody have a flooded 05 or has that problem been eliminated.
Old 02-21-2005 | 01:20 AM
  #2  
\\Konig\\'s Avatar
turrrbo!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 4
From: Santa Barbara
my 05 has never flooded
Old 02-21-2005 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
MercXP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
never
...
...
...
maybe i should mention ive had the car only 5 days..
Old 02-21-2005 | 04:22 AM
  #4  
nhk's Avatar
nhk
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
no .. (touch wood) I got it 3-4 months with 5600 + miles on it
Old 02-21-2005 | 04:25 AM
  #5  
Outlaws eXtreme's Avatar
2010 Prius - Miss the 8
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: LA/SGV...Miss the OC
Wanna try if it floods? Try turning on the engine, shutting it down fast, then turn it on again, and shut it down... if it passes that, no flood for 2005 cars
Old 02-21-2005 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
rx8cited's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro Area, USA
Originally Posted by Outlaws eXtreme
Wanna try if it floods? Try turning on the engine, shutting it down fast, then turn it on again, and shut it down... if it passes that, no flood for 2005 cars
I think you'd have better luck flooding it by waiting longer (hours or overnight) between the cold engine shutdown and trying to start it again :D.
Old 02-21-2005 | 11:08 AM
  #7  
Go48's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 2
From: Fayetteville, PA
Originally Posted by njcs
Does anybody have a flooded 05 or has that problem been eliminated.
The '05's are not substantially different from the '04's. And they are apparently at the original "M" (or later version of the "M", known as "N") flash for the PCM. So there should be no difference between the model years as far as flooding goes assuming the early '04's have been updated to at least the "L" flash. Flooding has more to do with startup/shutdown procedures and battery strength than model year.
Old 02-21-2005 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
Rotate's Avatar
Rotary Rules
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia
Good so far

I drive my RX8 on sunny days only in British Columbia, so it sits at times for a week or two between starts. It has started without fault so far. I will be watching my battery charge level very closely (reading the history reports on this problem).

I did have issues with my RX7 but then only on really hot days with a warm engine. Pulling the pump breakers and cranking cleared the fuel from the rotors and it restarted every time. I am hoping this car will not have that difficulty.

Fingers crossed,
Old 02-21-2005 | 02:20 PM
  #9  
HELAS's Avatar
Kal-El Is The One
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Brampton. Ontario
Well after 4 months with my '05, yesterday, it flooded for the frist time but it was not that bad cuz i was able to get it started anter 2 or so mins.
Old 02-22-2005 | 03:49 PM
  #10  
crazy naked man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
flooding

I have had my '04 8 for about 18 months now, with 38k miles on it. In the last 3 or 4 months, it has flooded on me 3 times and I have been unable to get it started any of the times following the proscribed procedure. I have had to have it towed to the dealership all 3 times, and I am about to give up on it.

Does anybody else find this to be a completely unacceptable design flaw? My dealer told me that it usually happens when the car is started for only a short time and not allowed to reach operating temps. This was only the case in one of my three floods, but in all cases the car sat for at least a day or more before the failed starts. Even if that were the case though, I find it unacceptable that the manufacturer is telling me that any time I start my care I have to run it for 5 or 10 minutes or I can expect this.

Furthermore, I find it totally unacceptable that Mazda knows of this problem and does not have a fix for it and is basically telling me that I can expect to have to deal with this from time to time.

I think more people will start having this problem as they get more miles on the cars, because I didn't experience it until about 32k.

I am within days of pursuing "lemon law" type legal action to try to force Mazda to buy my car back. I will not tolerate an 18 month old $30,000 car that I cannot rely on to start. Anybody have any input on this?

P.S. otherwise, I have loved this car and will be loathe to part with it, but I might have to start looking into a 350Z Track.

Last edited by crazy naked man; 02-22-2005 at 04:13 PM.
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:11 PM
  #11  
CaptainZoom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by crazy naked man
I have had my '04 8 for about 36 months now

36 months?
You got your car in february 2002?
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:13 PM
  #12  
crazy naked man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
mispint

sorry, corrected the error- had it for 18 months (August 03)

Also, does anybody think that a new, programmable ECU (like Canzoomer) would eliminate the problem, since it apears to be induced by the fuel control?

Last edited by crazy naked man; 02-22-2005 at 04:30 PM.
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:28 PM
  #13  
bowlhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Yes, just sent my certified letter to Mazda under the Lemon Law. I love the car, but find it unacceptable that it floods.


Originally Posted by crazy naked man
I have had my '04 8 for about 18 months now, with 38k miles on it. In the last 3 or 4 months, it has flooded on me 3 times and I have been unable to get it started any of the times following the proscribed procedure. I have had to have it towed to the dealership all 3 times, and I am about to give up on it.

Does anybody else find this to be a completely unacceptable design flaw? My dealer told me that it usually happens when the car is started for only a short time and not allowed to reach operating temps. This was only the case in one of my three floods, but in all cases the car sat for at least a day or more before the failed starts. Even if that were the case though, I find it unacceptable that the manufacturer is telling me that any time I start my care I have to run it for 5 or 10 minutes or I can expect this.

Furthermore, I find it totally unacceptable that Mazda knows of this problem and does not have a fix for it and is basically telling me that I can expect to have to deal with this from time to time.

I think more people will start having this problem as they get more miles on the cars, because I didn't experience it until about 32k.

I am within days of pursuing "lemon law" type legal action to try to force Mazda to buy my car back. I will not tolerate an 18 month old $30,000 car that I cannot rely on to start. Anybody have any input on this?

P.S. otherwise, I have loved this car and will be loathe to part with it, but I might have to start looking into a 350Z Track.
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:35 PM
  #14  
crazy naked man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
I found that most "lemon laws" have a statute of limitations of 12 months or 12k miles on them though- have you found this to be true/ does this apply to you?
I'm at 38k and 18 months, but most lemon laws also have a provision for the same problem 3 or more times.

Also, exactly where did you send your letter, and did you have to do anything prior to that? I have called customer service, which is basically useless, and officially lodged my complaint- is the next step a letter?
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:43 PM
  #15  
bowlhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
In NJ, it's 18,000 or one year, whichever comes first. The problem is supposed to have happened 3 times, I've flooded twice and told them we all know how easy this is to make it a third time. I love the car but in my situations cannot accept how easily it can flood making it unreliable. At the Philly car show, Mazda did state to me they had the same problems with the 05's. All my info is home, but I'd be glad to share it with you. I also sent the past two repairs bills showing the flooding. It should be interesting, I was within one year but first occurance was at 18,500. I just think they should make good on it. I live in a 2 square mile town making it impossible for me to resond in the 8 to any fire calls in town if the car is not warmed up.

Originally Posted by crazy naked man
I found that most "lemon laws" have a statute of limitations of 12 months or 12k miles on them though- have you found this to be true/ does this apply to you?
I'm at 38k and 18 months, but most lemon laws also have a provision for the same problem 3 or more times.

Also, exactly where did you send your letter, and did you have to do anything prior to that? I have called customer service, which is basically useless, and officially lodged my complaint- is the next step a letter?
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:45 PM
  #16  
salituro64's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: New York, Northern NYC Burbs
Originally Posted by crazy naked man
I have had my '04 8 for about 18 months now, with 38k miles on it. In the last 3 or 4 months, it has flooded on me 3 times and I have been unable to get it started any of the times following the proscribed procedure. I have had to have it towed to the dealership all 3 times, and I am about to give up on it.

Does anybody else find this to be a completely unacceptable design flaw? My dealer told me that it usually happens when the car is started for only a short time and not allowed to reach operating temps. This was only the case in one of my three floods, but in all cases the car sat for at least a day or more before the failed starts. Even if that were the case though, I find it unacceptable that the manufacturer is telling me that any time I start my care I have to run it for 5 or 10 minutes or I can expect this.

Furthermore, I find it totally unacceptable that Mazda knows of this problem and does not have a fix for it and is basically telling me that I can expect to have to deal with this from time to time.

I think more people will start having this problem as they get more miles on the cars, because I didn't experience it until about 32k.

I am within days of pursuing "lemon law" type legal action to try to force Mazda to buy my car back. I will not tolerate an 18 month old $30,000 car that I cannot rely on to start. Anybody have any input on this?

P.S. otherwise, I have loved this car and will be loathe to part with it, but I might have to start looking into a 350Z Track.
All this time and all these problems and this is your first post.
Old 02-22-2005 | 04:48 PM
  #17  
RotrDoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: I've shaken off the sands of SouthWest Asia and returned to Houston and Gulfport, MS
CrazyNaked and Bowlhead--

Mine is now is 16 months and 30,000 miles. I flooded it once when it was only a couple months old (the classic--had sat in the garage for a day or two, started only a few seconds to back out, then shut down and set out overnight--wouldn't start the next day). I have, since, followed the warm-up/shut down procedures religiously (that takes less than a minute) and have gotten the new flashes (L and M). No problems since, but there is always that nagging doubt---

But I, for one, love this car and am willing to tolerate that last bit of distrust.

The problem, in general, is endemic to rotary engines, and Mazda has made a good faith effort to develop new PCM programming and make it available to present owners. Unfortunately, some dealers, at least in the early months, threw up hurdles and harassment to owners who asked for the updates. I trust that Mazda will continue to work the issue until it is eliminated.

Good luck with your attempts to get a resolution to your satisfaction.

BTW--anyone out there know MazdaUSAs policy about flood outs/won't start after the warranty period? We who are cranking up a lot of miles are starting to look apprehensively at the 50,000 mile mark.
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:05 PM
  #18  
bowlhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Very good points, except my situation is somewhat critical with dependability. The second flood occurred for no reason, and I was being extremely careful following all directions. I'm hoping that with more complaints, Mazda will change their warranty coverage for this problem. Actually after putting 3 kids through college and finally having the money to purchase the car I really wanted, just find it frustrating to have this problem.

Originally Posted by RotrDoc
CrazyNaked and Bowlhead--

Mine is now is 16 months and 30,000 miles. I flooded it once when it was only a couple months old (the classic--had sat in the garage for a day or two, started only a few seconds to back out, then shut down and set out overnight--wouldn't start the next day). I have, since, followed the warm-up/shut down procedures religiously (that takes less than a minute) and have gotten the new flashes (L and M). No problems since, but there is always that nagging doubt---

But I, for one, love this car and am willing to tolerate that last bit of distrust.

The problem, in general, is endemic to rotary engines, and Mazda has made a good faith effort to develop new PCM programming and make it available to present owners. Unfortunately, some dealers, at least in the early months, threw up hurdles and harassment to owners who asked for the updates. I trust that Mazda will continue to work the issue until it is eliminated.

Good luck with your attempts to get a resolution to your satisfaction.

BTW--anyone out there know MazdaUSAs policy about flood outs/won't start after the warranty period? We who are cranking up a lot of miles are starting to look apprehensively at the 50,000 mile mark.
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:05 PM
  #19  
czr's Avatar
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
^Agreed RotrDoc. Check that you have updated flashes and make sure you don't kill your engine cold. Rev it before you shut down the engine as a precaution.

I saw one person over 50k here and his flooded after he reached it. The dealer charged him $200 to tow and deflood. He did not know about the flooding issue and I'm sure he could argue with Mazda and could have gotten his money back. Don't be scared. Just search the thread and be informed. I think a good bunch of the flood issues could be prevented.
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:07 PM
  #20  
czr's Avatar
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
bowlhead, what was the explanation the second time? Did they reflash you or change out your plugs?
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:08 PM
  #21  
crazy naked man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
i've been reading the site for a while, but never posted until now when my patience is at its end. I too love this car and hate the idea of parting with it, but like I said, only one of my three floods were caused by cold shut-off. The others were after driving 15 minutes home from work and not starting the car for more than a day.
My local dealer has given me no problems with getting the updates, but since a cold shut-off is not the only cause for it, I cannot bring myself to own a relatively new car that I paid $30k for that at any given time may decide not to start for me (twice this has happened when I was trying to leave for work).
I know Mazda has tried to fix it, but they have failed, and now all I am getting is basically "you're going to have to deal with this from time to time". THAT is unacceptable.
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:20 PM
  #22  
bowlhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
They did not have an explanation, said my flash was already updated from Nov, but they said they had a new version of plugs that they put in. I asked if it was fixed, and they wouldn't reply.

Originally Posted by czr
bowlhead, what was the explanation the second time? Did they reflash you or change out your plugs?
Old 02-22-2005 | 05:21 PM
  #23  
salituro64's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: New York, Northern NYC Burbs
Originally Posted by crazy naked man
i've been reading the site for a while, but never posted until now when my patience is at its end. I too love this car and hate the idea of parting with it, but like I said, only one of my three floods were caused by cold shut-off. The others were after driving 15 minutes home from work and not starting the car for more than a day.
My local dealer has given me no problems with getting the updates, but since a cold shut-off is not the only cause for it, I cannot bring myself to own a relatively new car that I paid $30k for that at any given time may decide not to start for me (twice this has happened when I was trying to leave for work).
I know Mazda has tried to fix it, but they have failed, and now all I am getting is basically "you're going to have to deal with this from time to time". THAT is unacceptable.
Check out the update flash (again) on 2/7/05...Could this be the final cure....
http://www.finishlineperformance.com.../01-008-05.pdf
Old 02-22-2005 | 06:38 PM
  #24  
\\Konig\\'s Avatar
turrrbo!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 4
From: Santa Barbara
ive noticed that after i put gas into my 8 it takes an extra long time to start, but it always starts
Old 02-22-2005 | 11:15 PM
  #25  
snap-on's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
If you have a constant fear of flooding have the dealer look into the trio of bulletins/MSP's

Re-flash per MSP-04

New Battery...640-690cca vs 320 stock

New starter (changing reduction ratio)

Have the dealer call the tech line for the third one....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Have An 05's Flooded?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.