Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Aggressive Wheel Fitment Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 08-15-2009, 08:35 PM
  #601  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the idea is I want more traction, so I don't think so
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 09:13 PM
  #602  
OMGITM!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tiltmode43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Were the 18x10.5 +43 265/35's on rolled fenders or stock?

If the +43 was stock I say go with 18x10.5 +30-35 if the +43 was on rolled I say go with 18x10.5 +38-43

Not too much work to make those fit!
tiltmode43 is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:12 PM
  #603  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
pretty sure hes stock fenders no rubbing on stechs
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:32 PM
  #604  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe I'll go 18x10 front and 18x11 rear...I want to rock the staggered look. But I'm not sure if 10" wide front rims are too big LOL
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:42 PM
  #605  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nah, rick has 10.5 in front
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:48 PM
  #606  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah and Matt's Prodrive's are 10.5" all around too, but I don't want it to look, too, "chunky" I guess, LOL. I dunno.
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:52 PM
  #607  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah totally know what you mean.... Id stay at 9.5 up front
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:53 PM
  #608  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fired off a few PM's to some vendors for quotes on the rims, so we'll see.

Then I'll need to sell my Grams..

It's between getting the new SSR rims or some other interesting parts....hmmm....
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:56 PM
  #609  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
know what tires you want yet?
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 11:05 PM
  #610  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hankook Ventius V12 Evo K110. If I get my planned 18x9.5/18x11 fitment, then I'm thinking 255/35-18 up front and 275/35-18 out back
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  #611  
OMGITM!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tiltmode43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Same size all around unless you love that nasty understeer!
tiltmode43 is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 11:31 PM
  #612  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some people dont track their car so its not important to them lol
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-15-2009, 11:52 PM
  #613  
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
TopGear8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
And some people prefer a staggered set up even on the track. I've talked to a few RX8 owners who do, just depends on driving style.
TopGear8 is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 12:12 AM
  #614  
OMGITM!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tiltmode43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
With all other things equal, changing from non-staggered to staggered causes understeer on our chassis. If you prefer the way that drives or tune the suspension components otherwise to dial it out then go for it but going staggered in itself will cause understeer coming from non-staggered. If your car balances well as it is with the same size tires in front and rear, what will happen if you keep the tire size (grip) the same in the front yet increase tire size (grip) in the rear?

Would make it "safer" though, the slight understeer, albeit potentially a hair slower...

But yeah, all comes down to preference lol.
tiltmode43 is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 02:31 PM
  #615  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well my car has significantly more oversteer than you guys (try throttling in a corner with 300+ rwhp and we'll talk), so adding some understeer may be a good thing.

I need more rear traction but I don't want some huge front tires so I can still have a turning radius.
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 03:03 PM
  #616  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Heres their offest chart:

I would stick with 18x9 245/40/18 & 18x10 275/35/18 as those will be the lightest, most aggressive wheels running these tire sizes. (which is what it sounds like you want)

Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 03:27 PM
  #617  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol that's confusing...so the numbers in the value boxes is the size of the lip? The lowest offset I can get is +34mm? Confusing....
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 03:38 PM
  #618  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah I know, it's wierd. I'm hoping c41250n chimes in as he had 19x10 "low disk" or "super low" offset (+24 I think he said it was)
Ross_Dawg is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 03:43 PM
  #619  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The more I think about I might just stay with my Grams- they are lightweight, look good, and don't have any issues. It will free up $$ for some other interesting parts...
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 05:23 PM
  #620  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
You sure the number under offset (34, 46, etc) isn't the size of the lip or whatever? and then the numbers under SL, NR, MD, etc. are the possible offsets of the wheel? Thats the way I understand it, but I'm no expert.
J8635621 is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 06:05 PM
  #621  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by j8635621
You sure the number under offset (34, 46, etc) isn't the size of the lip or whatever? and then the numbers under SL, NR, MD, etc. are the possible offsets of the wheel? Thats the way I understand it, but I'm no expert.
That would make the most sense actually, thanks!
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 06:22 PM
  #622  
OMGITM!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
tiltmode43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by chickenwafer
Well my car has significantly more oversteer than you guys (try throttling in a corner with 300+ rwhp and we'll talk), so adding some understeer may be a good thing.

I need more rear traction but I don't want some huge front tires so I can still have a turning radius.
tail happy =/= a car havine overseer. You can load buckets of power or clutch kick any rwd car and have the rear come around. I'd consider oversteer a car's tendancy to turn into the corner under hard driving rather than plow out (imagine a downhill run in neutral). But thats just me being picky, lol...

Not going aggressive? gtfo!




jk chikenwafer...
tiltmode43 is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 07:31 PM
  #623  
Registered User
 
alexisthemovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: la crescenta, ca
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Last edited by alexisthemovie; 08-20-2009 at 01:47 AM.
alexisthemovie is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 08:01 PM
  #624  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
tail happy =/= a car havine overseer. You can load buckets of power or clutch kick any rwd car and have the rear come around. I'd consider oversteer a car's tendancy to turn into the corner under hard driving rather than plow out (imagine a downhill run in neutral). But thats just me being picky, lol...

Not going aggressive? gtfo!




jk chikenwafer...
LOL my rear end comes out when I go hard into a corner reguardless of how much throttle I give it (my rear spring are too stiff I believe), so it gets even worse when I apply power (not clutch kicking or any of that nonsense, just good old fashioned powwa)

But I hardly think this is the thread to debate handling, LOL, aggressive wheels are more often than not going hurt it.
chickenwafer is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 08:42 PM
  #625  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by alexisthemovie

as seen on hellaflush.com
-6 camber FTL
Ross_Dawg is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Aggressive Wheel Fitment Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.