Brake Upgrades?????
#26
Thanks, guys....this is what I'm talkin' about!!! It'll take a little while to read those links, Bfulmer, but they look very interesting.
Now...say I were to upgrade to decent pads that operate best at high temps...luv 'em on the track.....but what happens when a deer jumps in front of me after a 20 minute highway drive?? Same great stops or less stopping power since I haven't used the brakes...venison?
Now...say I were to upgrade to decent pads that operate best at high temps...luv 'em on the track.....but what happens when a deer jumps in front of me after a 20 minute highway drive?? Same great stops or less stopping power since I haven't used the brakes...venison?
#29
Now...say I were to upgrade to decent pads that operate best at high temps...luv 'em on the track.....but what happens when a deer jumps in front of me after a 20 minute highway drive?? Same great stops or less stopping power since I haven't used the brakes...venison?
#30
Anyone have track day experience with their stock brakes? How do they do? Any fade? I'm planning to do a track day a Gingerman Raceway this spring and am interested in finding out, but not "the hard way".
Stew
Stew
#31
They last pretty much all day long but feel like crap for about 2 weeks after the event. Your tires will also gum up a bit due to how hot they get and how much rubber is left on the track from people who use slicks. They will last the whole day though. Just dont plan on spending two days at the track...
#32
On a car without ABS or EBD (such as my '94 Miata) I have found two ways to decrease stopping distances - fit stickier tires, or improve the brake bias. I did both, and it had a dramatic impact on the braking distances. But the '94 non-ABS Miata had too much front bias from the factory. Mazda has learned allot since then.
On a car like the RX-8 with ABS and EBD, it seems intuitive that mucking with the bias (intentionally or unintentionally) won't have much of an impact on braking distances. Yet I just recently read a report in Grassroots Motorsports where they did decrease the average braking distance of a C6 Corvette by fitting a BBK. It wasn't a huge difference, but it was repeatable.
Having said all that, I can think of three reasons why a BBK *might* decrease braking distances:
1. Lower unsprung weight (many BBKs are lighter than the factory setup) results in fractionally better mechanical grip.
2. Improvements to the bias. Again I think EBD would eleminate this effect, but I'm not 100% sure.
3. A more repsonsive pedal helps the driver put the car up against the threshold of lockup more quickly and/or more predictably, hence picking up a few feet. This would more likely be true of a car with just "average" brakes from the factory.
Of these three, I'd guess that the RX-8 would only benefit from reason 1, possibly 3.
George
On a car like the RX-8 with ABS and EBD, it seems intuitive that mucking with the bias (intentionally or unintentionally) won't have much of an impact on braking distances. Yet I just recently read a report in Grassroots Motorsports where they did decrease the average braking distance of a C6 Corvette by fitting a BBK. It wasn't a huge difference, but it was repeatable.
Having said all that, I can think of three reasons why a BBK *might* decrease braking distances:
1. Lower unsprung weight (many BBKs are lighter than the factory setup) results in fractionally better mechanical grip.
2. Improvements to the bias. Again I think EBD would eleminate this effect, but I'm not 100% sure.
3. A more repsonsive pedal helps the driver put the car up against the threshold of lockup more quickly and/or more predictably, hence picking up a few feet. This would more likely be true of a car with just "average" brakes from the factory.
Of these three, I'd guess that the RX-8 would only benefit from reason 1, possibly 3.
George
#33
Originally Posted by StewC625
Anyone have track day experience with their stock brakes? How do they do? Any fade? I'm planning to do a track day a Gingerman Raceway this spring and am interested in finding out, but not "the hard way".
Stew
Stew
Would I do a BBK? Sure but I would spend the 2500+ on coilovers first. I would also want to allocate money to lightweight 17" wheels with some R-Compound tires. Then I would experiment with new rotors and pads. Finally, I would think about a BBK.
I think my next mod is some braided steel brake lines and clutch line.
#34
Anyone have track day experience with their stock brakes? How do they do? Any fade? I'm planning to do a track day a Gingerman Raceway this spring and am interested in finding out, but not "the hard way".
Stew
Stew
Hope that helps
#35
I have run 3 track days at Sears Point with the Mazdaspeed pads on my otherwise stock car. No fade on track, and no ill effects afterwards. Sears Point is not known for being hard on brakes, though.
Since this hasn't been addressed in simple terms in this thread, I'll do it.
There are two main reasons an F1 car stops from higher speeds in shorter distances than an RX-8. They're the same two reasons why an F1 car can corner with greater force than an RX-8. Those reasons are traction and mass.
If you're using brakes to decelerate a car, you can't brake with more force than the tires can apply to the road. You'll just lock up the tires. This is why everybody says big brake kits aren't really necessary for most RX-8s. You can lock up the tires fairly easily. Put stickier tires on the car and you have more traction, so you can apply more braking force to the road and stop the car in a shorter distance. F1 cars have tires that are 14 or 15 inches wide and are so sticky they don't last 500 miles. RX-8s have tires maybe 8 or 9" wide and last 25,000 miles or so. You can see that there is going to be a difference in the amount of deceleration that these cars are capable of just based on the tires alone, without even considering the additional traction from downforce generated by the F1 car's aerodynamics.
The other reason that F1 cars stop quicker is that they weigh less than half of what an RX-8 does. Less mass means lower inertia, which means that the brakes & tires slow the car down faster than a car with more mass (& thus higher inertia). This is easy to experience on the street - an unloaded pickup truck stops in a shorter distance than the same truck loaded with 1000lb worth of payload.
A legitimate reason for upgrading the brake package is for fade resistance. Brakes work by turning kinetic energy into heat energy. That is, brakes apply pads to discs, and the friction slows down the discs and generates heat. If you get too much heat buildup in the discs, the pads get outside their optimal operating conditions and don't work too well anymore. That's brake fade, and it happens when you stop many times from high speeds without enough time between stops for the brakes to cool. If you have a brake disc that has a larger mass, it can hold more heat. It also has more area with which to dissipate heat into the air. These factors mean a bigger brake setup (not just diameter, but thickness also) can handle the rigors of repeated stops better.
In general terms, if you can lock up your tires under braking, and you're not experiencing brake fade, your braking system is adequate. This is what bfulmer was saying early on in this thread. Accordingly, I have the Mazdaspeed pads on my car because I was concerned about fade on track, not because I was looking for shorter stopping distances. bfulmer has the Stoptechs on his car because he was experiencing fade on track.
I don't believe he said that all brakes were equal. He was saying that the RX-8's brake system doesn't need improvement for the circumstances that the majority of these cars see. And in the case of the Mustang BBK tests, keep in mind that Mustangs have some pretty sorry excuses for factory brake systems. 11.5" front rotors on a 3400-pound car? Not my idea of a good time. It's possible to fade those things with a single hard stop from high speeds.
Originally Posted by davefzr
I just dont get your logic is all.. maybe you can explain it to me. If your saying that if we put our stock RX8 brakes on an F1 car that it would still be able to brake from 150 in 100 ft. then why cant we brake our RX8's from 60 in 100 ft.? I dont get that. Are you saying that the downforce and sticky tires of an F1 car account for 80 % of the stopping power? How do you come to this conclusion? Since you have 15 years experience you can explain this to me and others.. I just dont get it...
There are two main reasons an F1 car stops from higher speeds in shorter distances than an RX-8. They're the same two reasons why an F1 car can corner with greater force than an RX-8. Those reasons are traction and mass.
If you're using brakes to decelerate a car, you can't brake with more force than the tires can apply to the road. You'll just lock up the tires. This is why everybody says big brake kits aren't really necessary for most RX-8s. You can lock up the tires fairly easily. Put stickier tires on the car and you have more traction, so you can apply more braking force to the road and stop the car in a shorter distance. F1 cars have tires that are 14 or 15 inches wide and are so sticky they don't last 500 miles. RX-8s have tires maybe 8 or 9" wide and last 25,000 miles or so. You can see that there is going to be a difference in the amount of deceleration that these cars are capable of just based on the tires alone, without even considering the additional traction from downforce generated by the F1 car's aerodynamics.
The other reason that F1 cars stop quicker is that they weigh less than half of what an RX-8 does. Less mass means lower inertia, which means that the brakes & tires slow the car down faster than a car with more mass (& thus higher inertia). This is easy to experience on the street - an unloaded pickup truck stops in a shorter distance than the same truck loaded with 1000lb worth of payload.
A legitimate reason for upgrading the brake package is for fade resistance. Brakes work by turning kinetic energy into heat energy. That is, brakes apply pads to discs, and the friction slows down the discs and generates heat. If you get too much heat buildup in the discs, the pads get outside their optimal operating conditions and don't work too well anymore. That's brake fade, and it happens when you stop many times from high speeds without enough time between stops for the brakes to cool. If you have a brake disc that has a larger mass, it can hold more heat. It also has more area with which to dissipate heat into the air. These factors mean a bigger brake setup (not just diameter, but thickness also) can handle the rigors of repeated stops better.
In general terms, if you can lock up your tires under braking, and you're not experiencing brake fade, your braking system is adequate. This is what bfulmer was saying early on in this thread. Accordingly, I have the Mazdaspeed pads on my car because I was concerned about fade on track, not because I was looking for shorter stopping distances. bfulmer has the Stoptechs on his car because he was experiencing fade on track.
Originally Posted by davefzr
furthermore.. if all brakes were equal.. why do the enzos rotors/calipers cost 30,000 each? Why not just slap on some 4 piston caliper brakes and call it quits if they gain nothing...?
Last edited by Matt-man; 12-23-2004 at 12:58 AM. Reason: clarification: inertia
#37
Originally Posted by bfulmer
Exactly what I said! Racing teams use larger rotors and different linings to absorb heat. And by the way, F1 cars have tons of downforce and very sticky tires. Thats why they stop faster. If you put rx8 brakes on a F1 car, you could stop just as fast for one or two times until the brakes get too hot. Remember, tires limit you stopping distance, brakes don't.
As for the EBC pads, I can't speak to their performance on an RX-8, but they're extremely popular on Saabs, to some extent for their stopping performance, but at least as much for the absence of brake dust.
#39
Originally Posted by jsh1120
As for the EBC pads, I can't speak to their performance on an RX-8, but they're extremely popular on Saabs, to some extent for their stopping performance, but at least as much for the absence of brake dust.
Granted, the Red Stuff are track quality pads so you get a little more noise. For instance, since the temp has gotten down into the 30s here I have had minor squealing until the brakes get up to temp.. But after that it goes away.
#40
I have the MS pads. I think the pads are good for now.
But I want to find some slotted only rotors, and I want them to be light, and same as stock in diameter. Can anyone help me?
I 've seen the Autoexe, which are lighter, at japanparts.com. You shave about 2kg, but they are truly expensive: $700 the pair
Rotora has too, but don't know how much they weigh...
Philodox, do you have any tips about yours? Thanks
But I want to find some slotted only rotors, and I want them to be light, and same as stock in diameter. Can anyone help me?
I 've seen the Autoexe, which are lighter, at japanparts.com. You shave about 2kg, but they are truly expensive: $700 the pair
Rotora has too, but don't know how much they weigh...
Philodox, do you have any tips about yours? Thanks
#41
Originally Posted by RotorManiac
I have the MS pads. I think the pads are good for now.
But I want to find some slotted only rotors, and I want them to be light, and same as stock in diameter. Can anyone help me?
I 've seen the Autoexe, which are lighter, at japanparts.com. You shave about 2kg, but they are truly expensive: $700 the pair
Rotora has too, but don't know how much they weigh...
Philodox, do you have any tips about yours? Thanks
But I want to find some slotted only rotors, and I want them to be light, and same as stock in diameter. Can anyone help me?
I 've seen the Autoexe, which are lighter, at japanparts.com. You shave about 2kg, but they are truly expensive: $700 the pair
Rotora has too, but don't know how much they weigh...
Philodox, do you have any tips about yours? Thanks
#43
Originally Posted by DreRX8
Do the EBC Red Stuff Brake pads squeal more than the pre-TSB Mazda pads? Thinking about changing out to these pads. And do they only squeal when cold?
#44
I got the Hawk HPS (street pads) brake pads. I like them. Not much different felt from the stock pads, but my braking feel was already pretty good from upgrading to the Goodridge stainless steel brakelines. There was a Powerslot/Hawk rep. at the Racing Beat event. He was talking brake pad thermal efficiency when we went by his table. It was quite interesting, talked about how each has a different rating that signifies operating temperature, and how the Hawks were like 2 letter grades higher, made to operate in substantially higher temperatures (tracking).
#45
Hawk has a whole range of pad compounds for different levels of abuse. I used the HPS compound for street duty and the Black or Blue compounds for track events on my old Mustang (275RWHP, 3400-ish pounds) and I was happy with their performance. The Miata guys I've talked to could get away with the HP+ compound, but on the heavy Mustang they'd fade in a couple of laps even on street tires.
#46
I messed around with different pads quite a bit on my previous car and I think they mainly made improvements in feel, they seemed to make the pedal a little more sensitive. But I doubt they actually shortened the distance much, especially from lower speeds, because they actually made it easier to lock the wheels. But different tires made a huge difference.
Another thing I heard is if you want to upgrade brakes, you have to do the whole system. If you have bigger rotors and pistons with the original master cylinder, the master cylinder isn't able to provide any more total force than before, so it is just spread out over the larger piston surface area, but with less force per square inch.
Another thing I heard is if you want to upgrade brakes, you have to do the whole system. If you have bigger rotors and pistons with the original master cylinder, the master cylinder isn't able to provide any more total force than before, so it is just spread out over the larger piston surface area, but with less force per square inch.
Last edited by Brandon; 12-29-2004 at 02:37 PM.
#47
They last pretty much all day long but feel like crap for about 2 weeks after the event.
When I read your post, I decided to wait a while before even having diags done. It is much better after 10 days, although it still feels like I warped the rotors.
Has anyone warped stock rotors? If so, did you replace them with reasonably-priced rotors and upgrade the pads, and have they performed well since then? These brakes test well, I just want to be able to drive hot laps all day without warping the rotors.
#48
Originally Posted by WOTsup
Thanks for posting this. I thought I'd wrecked my brakes at Laguna Seca. I was pushing it harder than I ever have. The brakes went from just fine to crunchy and pulsating in about 4 laps. I noticed it the first time in turn #1; 100+ mph to 30+ on the edge of the ABS.
When I read your post, I decided to wait a while before even having diags done. It is much better after 10 days, although it still feels like I warped the rotors.
Has anyone warped stock rotors? If so, did you replace them with reasonably-priced rotors and upgrade the pads, and have they performed well since then? These brakes test well, I just want to be able to drive hot laps all day without warping the rotors.
When I read your post, I decided to wait a while before even having diags done. It is much better after 10 days, although it still feels like I warped the rotors.
Has anyone warped stock rotors? If so, did you replace them with reasonably-priced rotors and upgrade the pads, and have they performed well since then? These brakes test well, I just want to be able to drive hot laps all day without warping the rotors.
http://www.stoptech.com/faq/data/faq25.htm
http://www.stoptech.com/whitepapers/...otors_myth.htm
Although we are talking about two piece rotors, the phenomenon can also occur with one piece rotors, especially at the track where stock pads can't take the temperatures.
Also, the StopTech kits don't need you to replace the entire brake system. You don't even need to replace the master cylinder. All of our kits are meant to work with stock brake systems and abs systems.