Not impressed with Rotora quality control
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not impressed with Rotora quality control
Installed Rotora slotted rotors front/rear yesterday and I'm not impressed with their quality control. The rotor casting is sloppy and the vented part is slanted instead of parallel to the rotor surfaces. This results in noticable thickness variation and requires considerable balance grinding.
In the first pic you can see one side is 0.225" thick and the other is 0.370". In the second pic you can see that both sides are equally thick (0.300") and a huge amount was milled out to balance the rotor.
I don't know if the uneven thickness will cause warping or other problems. Time will tell I guess.
Oh, in case 0.07" variation doesn't sound like much, let me put it in context. It's more than 1/16th of an inch and roughly 25% variation in thickness. That's huge. When the overall thickness wears down 0.8" it's time to replace the rotor. The variance in each side is almost that much.
________
MAGIC FLIGHT LAUNCH BOX REVIEW
In the first pic you can see one side is 0.225" thick and the other is 0.370". In the second pic you can see that both sides are equally thick (0.300") and a huge amount was milled out to balance the rotor.
I don't know if the uneven thickness will cause warping or other problems. Time will tell I guess.
Oh, in case 0.07" variation doesn't sound like much, let me put it in context. It's more than 1/16th of an inch and roughly 25% variation in thickness. That's huge. When the overall thickness wears down 0.8" it's time to replace the rotor. The variance in each side is almost that much.
________
MAGIC FLIGHT LAUNCH BOX REVIEW
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:45 AM.
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think it was a fluke. Mill balancing is a manual process so they knew how much they were grinding off to make it balance. This was the worst example but all four rotors had noticable variations in thickness you could see with your eyeball.
________
Lovely Wendie
________
Lovely Wendie
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:45 AM.
#5
Rangers Lead The Way!
I have the Rotora drilled/slotted on my RX-8 which I bought through VividRacing. I did not see this in any of the rotors (front or rear). It may be that the 'batch' that yours were made in were constructed poorly.
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
philodox, I don't want to question what you're saying but did you actually look for face thickness variation? It wasn't something I would have noticed except the large milled area made me take a second look. Sorta like how I missing the writing on each box that indicated whether it was for the right or left side until after I installed the rotors. The writing was plain enough to see but I simply hadn't thought to look.
________
Ipad Guides
________
Ipad Guides
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:45 AM.
#7
Rangers Lead The Way!
I just took another 'once over' look at the rotors, the outer sidewall of it is thicker than the inside, this is the same for all 4. I had a brake specialist put my rotors on since I couldn't get the damn things off (the screw that holds the old rotor to the wheel hub was frozen, had to drill them out). They said they looked just fine and not to worry about it. I just chalked the fact that all 4 are uniform as far as wall thickness up to design and not bad quality control.
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
philodox, there's an important distinction I may have miscommunicated. Hopefully bullet points will ease comprehension.
1. Looking from the top down rotors have an inside face of solid metal, a middle area of air vanes, an outside face of solid metal and then the hat.
2. On the front rotors the outside face is thicker than the inside face. That's normal and isn't what I'm talking about.
3. What I am talking about is the inside face varies in thickness. At one end it is 0.225". At the opposite end the inside face is 0.300". The same is true for the outside face, which varies from 0.370" to 0.300".
4. The easiest way to tell is look at the face thickness at 4 equidistant points (12-, 3-, 6- and 9-o'clock). They should be the same.
I've included a crude sketch to illustrate this problem.
________
CHRYSLER 300 HISTORY
1. Looking from the top down rotors have an inside face of solid metal, a middle area of air vanes, an outside face of solid metal and then the hat.
2. On the front rotors the outside face is thicker than the inside face. That's normal and isn't what I'm talking about.
3. What I am talking about is the inside face varies in thickness. At one end it is 0.225". At the opposite end the inside face is 0.300". The same is true for the outside face, which varies from 0.370" to 0.300".
4. The easiest way to tell is look at the face thickness at 4 equidistant points (12-, 3-, 6- and 9-o'clock). They should be the same.
I've included a crude sketch to illustrate this problem.
________
CHRYSLER 300 HISTORY
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:45 AM.
#10
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
philodox, there's an important distinction I may have miscommunicated. Hopefully bullet points will ease comprehension.
1. Looking from the top down rotors have an inside face of solid metal, a middle area of air vanes, an outside face of solid metal and then the hat.
2. On the front rotors the outside face is thicker than the inside face. That's normal and isn't what I'm talking about.
3. What I am talking about is the inside face varies in thickness. At one end it is 0.225". At the opposite end the inside face is 0.300". The same is true for the outside face, which varies from 0.370" to 0.300".
4. The easiest way to tell is look at the face thickness at 4 equidistant points (12-, 3-, 6- and 9-o'clock). They should be the same.
I've included a crude sketch to illustrate this problem.
1. Looking from the top down rotors have an inside face of solid metal, a middle area of air vanes, an outside face of solid metal and then the hat.
2. On the front rotors the outside face is thicker than the inside face. That's normal and isn't what I'm talking about.
3. What I am talking about is the inside face varies in thickness. At one end it is 0.225". At the opposite end the inside face is 0.300". The same is true for the outside face, which varies from 0.370" to 0.300".
4. The easiest way to tell is look at the face thickness at 4 equidistant points (12-, 3-, 6- and 9-o'clock). They should be the same.
I've included a crude sketch to illustrate this problem.
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I emailed Rotora the first two images along with a description of the problem. Haven't heard anything back from them regarding this issue.
I don't think it's intentional--at least I hope it isn't. The vent area should be parallel to the rotor faces. Any grinding done to balance the rotor after casting should be due to small irregularities in the vane area. No way should the amount ground off be anywhere near as much as what you see in the second photo.
________
HAWAII MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
I don't think it's intentional--at least I hope it isn't. The vent area should be parallel to the rotor faces. Any grinding done to balance the rotor after casting should be due to small irregularities in the vane area. No way should the amount ground off be anywhere near as much as what you see in the second photo.
________
HAWAII MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:45 AM.
#12
Rangers Lead The Way!
Great work, please let us know what Rotora says in responce to this. I am getting ceramic pads soon, so that should help with the wear on the rotors themselves to help give some extra longevity to them.
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the response from Rotora:
Thank you for email and our apologies for this rotor that you received.
Here at Rotora, we try to QC all parts during machining and before parts are send out. In this situation a rotor got pass our QC process.
The thickness variation on the inner and outer brake surface is from what we call ?CORE SHIFT? in the core of the rotor during casting. This core shift is usually caused by moisture build up in the core due to humidity before it is used for casing or core box was not properly torque down.
The acceptable thickness variation on the inner and outer brake surface (measurement in your photos) should be 0.1 mm. While our DTV is at 0.0127 mm.
Please return the parts to us and we will you another rotor.
It's nice they acknowledge it's a defect instead of trying to claim it's okay. It would be nicer if they did better QC or paid for return shipping. Oh well.
________
CHEAP YT385 SPRING METAL AIRSOFT PISTOL
Thank you for email and our apologies for this rotor that you received.
Here at Rotora, we try to QC all parts during machining and before parts are send out. In this situation a rotor got pass our QC process.
The thickness variation on the inner and outer brake surface is from what we call ?CORE SHIFT? in the core of the rotor during casting. This core shift is usually caused by moisture build up in the core due to humidity before it is used for casing or core box was not properly torque down.
The acceptable thickness variation on the inner and outer brake surface (measurement in your photos) should be 0.1 mm. While our DTV is at 0.0127 mm.
Please return the parts to us and we will you another rotor.
It's nice they acknowledge it's a defect instead of trying to claim it's okay. It would be nicer if they did better QC or paid for return shipping. Oh well.
________
CHEAP YT385 SPRING METAL AIRSOFT PISTOL
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 04:46 AM.
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotors are rotors pretty much. Except for balancing I can't see how they'd "go bad".
________
PRILOSEC LAWSUIT INFO
________
PRILOSEC LAWSUIT INFO
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 05:23 AM.
#18
Rotary Abuser
True....
I am purchasing new rotor/pads for my car and I am going to go with the Rotora slotted or the PowerSlot rotors.
Is there any slight vibration or "hum" under braking with these slotted rotors? I ask because one of the manufacturers said in a disclaimer that it is normal with the slotted design.
Also, Have you heard anything about Axxis pads? I was thinking about going with the Axxis ultimate with my new rotors. I have OEM pads with 90% friction material left, however it just sounds like a good idea to do rotors/pads together. If they are less dusty and quieter will be a bonus as well.
I am purchasing new rotor/pads for my car and I am going to go with the Rotora slotted or the PowerSlot rotors.
Is there any slight vibration or "hum" under braking with these slotted rotors? I ask because one of the manufacturers said in a disclaimer that it is normal with the slotted design.
Also, Have you heard anything about Axxis pads? I was thinking about going with the Axxis ultimate with my new rotors. I have OEM pads with 90% friction material left, however it just sounds like a good idea to do rotors/pads together. If they are less dusty and quieter will be a bonus as well.
Last edited by Gyro; 02-04-2005 at 08:35 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pdxhak
General Automotive
7
09-22-2015 07:39 AM