Will It Fit Thread
#4902
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
^ 18x9.5 +38 are flush in the rear, but stick out a little in the front, given stock suspension height and camber. So any lower positive camber would really stick out.
245x40 on 18x8 +38 is a popular mix however. Keep in mind that stock is 18x8 +50.
255x40 on a 18x9 +38 is a good setup as well.
Again, 18x9.5 is wasted on anything narrower than 265 or 275x35 imho.
245x40 on 18x8 +38 is a popular mix however. Keep in mind that stock is 18x8 +50.
255x40 on a 18x9 +38 is a good setup as well.
Again, 18x9.5 is wasted on anything narrower than 265 or 275x35 imho.
#4903
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear maybe, if you have stock height and virtually no negative camber. If your car is dropped going to need to shave another 10mm off that offset to get a flush rear and poke at the front.
I still have a hard time believing 18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear and pokes on the front. Kane is running 18x9.5 +28 and his barely, looks flush in the rear with little negative camber.
I still have a hard time believing 18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear and pokes on the front. Kane is running 18x9.5 +28 and his barely, looks flush in the rear with little negative camber.
#4905
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
I disagree with the cartoon silly. A 18x9.5 +22 is similarly close to my 18x10 +28 and it looks dead on flush in the rear with the drop which naturally created a -2.5 camber in the rear and -1.5 camber in the front. The fronts slightly poke out but imo, the setup would be dead on for a drop and flush look.
#4906
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
![](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3389/4566376200_b45d286f1b_o.jpg)
Best one I have at the moment. 9.5 +38/+28 with 245/40 Nitto Invo and about -2.2 camber all around (lowered on coilovers). I have a 5mm spacer on the front now though. It still needs another 5mm more to be as flush as I would like in the front. Hope to run 265/35 next go around.
With MS springs/Koni struts, I had +38/+33 and it fit pretty good.
Last edited by J8635621; 06-22-2010 at 09:13 AM.
#4909
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
I was watching Boondocks the other night actually lol. I don't normally watch it for some reason, but it is pretty funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbmU3...layer_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbmU3...layer_embedded
#4910
I usually just lurk here, but I'm thinking about some new rims. What would be some recommended tire sizes for 18x8.5 +35? I looked through some of the thread, but it's a pretty long one.
#4912
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
I know its an opinion (and a humble one at that, :P) but you've really got to take a few things into consideration before deciding what is the most proper tire size for any given wheel width.
First of all, what is the main purpose? Short courses and autocross setups definitely have been proven to benefit from the most rubber possible, but this is because friction does not come into play. A wider tire will offer more resistance and can slow one down in the straights.
Something else that people often don't realize is that 20mm more rubber does not mean 20mm more of a contact patch. To maximize the use of a tire's tread, maximizing the footprint for that tire's size, you'd actually want to match the tire width to that of the wheel, approximately at least. Thus, the proper sized tire for a 9.5" wheel, to maximize mechanical grip of said tire would be closer to a 245mm, rather than a 275mm.
Another factor that tire width plays on handling is responsiveness. Many know the smaller the sidewall, the more responsive a tire will be. Tire width, which has an effect on the sidewall, can also play a part in the responsiveness of a tire. A tire who's sides are bulging from width, will not have as stiff a sidewall as a tire that is ever so slightly stretched. Thus, a tire fitted to a wheel's size, rather than greatly exceeding the wheel's width, will offer better responsiveness.
Lastly, in maximizing the mechanical grip of a tire and increasing responsiveness, you are also saving a bit of unsprung weight (think 245 Vs 275 series tire weights).
Just food for thought as to why anything less than 265-275 is not necessarily a waste on a 9.5" wheel.
First of all, what is the main purpose? Short courses and autocross setups definitely have been proven to benefit from the most rubber possible, but this is because friction does not come into play. A wider tire will offer more resistance and can slow one down in the straights.
Something else that people often don't realize is that 20mm more rubber does not mean 20mm more of a contact patch. To maximize the use of a tire's tread, maximizing the footprint for that tire's size, you'd actually want to match the tire width to that of the wheel, approximately at least. Thus, the proper sized tire for a 9.5" wheel, to maximize mechanical grip of said tire would be closer to a 245mm, rather than a 275mm.
Another factor that tire width plays on handling is responsiveness. Many know the smaller the sidewall, the more responsive a tire will be. Tire width, which has an effect on the sidewall, can also play a part in the responsiveness of a tire. A tire who's sides are bulging from width, will not have as stiff a sidewall as a tire that is ever so slightly stretched. Thus, a tire fitted to a wheel's size, rather than greatly exceeding the wheel's width, will offer better responsiveness.
Lastly, in maximizing the mechanical grip of a tire and increasing responsiveness, you are also saving a bit of unsprung weight (think 245 Vs 275 series tire weights).
Just food for thought as to why anything less than 265-275 is not necessarily a waste on a 9.5" wheel.
#4913
Toyota Master Technician
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3389/4566376200_b45d286f1b_o.jpg)
Best one I have at the moment. 9.5 +38/+28 with 245/40 Nitto Invo and about -2.2 camber all around (lowered on coilovers). I have a 5mm spacer on the front now though. It still needs another 5mm more to be as flush as I would like in the front. Hope to run 265/35 next go around.
With MS springs/Koni struts, I had +38/+33 and it fit pretty good.
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#4914
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
I'm citing direct experience as I have Enkei RP03 18x9.5 +38 with 265x35 BFG g-Force, stock suspension height and camber, and they are perfectly flush in the rear, but stick out a bit in the front.
18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear maybe, if you have stock height and virtually no negative camber. If your car is dropped going to need to shave another 10mm off that offset to get a flush rear and poke at the front.
I still have a hard time believing 18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear and pokes on the front. Kane is running 18x9.5 +28 and his barely, looks flush in the rear with little negative camber.
I still have a hard time believing 18x9.5 +38 is flush on the rear and pokes on the front. Kane is running 18x9.5 +28 and his barely, looks flush in the rear with little negative camber.
#4917
can i make a rota p45r2(i know it's cheap, but i'm broke...lmao..) 18x9.5 +25 fit? or should i go +35? my car is dropped prolly an 1"1/2 all around... but it's adjustable... thanks in advance..
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#4920
Chi's Finest
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, Il
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FRONT- 18x9 off 24 - 245 40 18
REAR - 18x10 off 22 - 255 40 18 maybe 265 35 18
lowered on gf's and existing rear fender roll, im trying to fill the wheel wells
by the way this is a FR500 rim set up....... been trying to work on this for a while. will post pics when finished.
REAR - 18x10 off 22 - 255 40 18 maybe 265 35 18
lowered on gf's and existing rear fender roll, im trying to fill the wheel wells
by the way this is a FR500 rim set up....... been trying to work on this for a while. will post pics when finished.
#4921
Newbie here... Just wondering .. its probly been mention alot alot of times ... but to be fast i ask it here again hehe....Was wondering whats the widest can you fit in the rear and thats without any custom work no rolling the fender and all just flus and beefy,mean... looking .. Car is stock at the moment not trying to get lowered or anything more for looks then anything at this time
Pleas help a cuban out :D
Pleas help a cuban out :D
#4923
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
Crazycuban....this is the will it fit thread, not the what will fit thread. If you want flush, you have to roll the fenders. Not really sure what the maximum inner clearances are to be honest. You might have to get a ruler and figure it out for all of us.
lzhmax...Those should both be fine. Since you are lowered, a 255/40 MAY be too tall and will rub away the fender liner in the front.
lzhmax...Those should both be fine. Since you are lowered, a 255/40 MAY be too tall and will rub away the fender liner in the front.
#4924
Work vs xx 18x10 what kind of off set should I get to be flush?http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/w...3-p-11292.html
I'm also looking at gramlights 57pro 18x10 or 18x9.5 but dont know what off set to get to be flushhttp://gramlights.com/wheels/57pro/fitment2.html
What off set will be flush on a 10 or 10.5? and 9.5 wheel?
I'm also looking at gramlights 57pro 18x10 or 18x9.5 but dont know what off set to get to be flushhttp://gramlights.com/wheels/57pro/fitment2.html
What off set will be flush on a 10 or 10.5? and 9.5 wheel?
Last edited by @!!narotordo; 06-27-2010 at 07:01 PM.
#4925
ATTN NEWBIES!
I have 18x9.5 +35 on stock tires (225/45/18) its not flush (dose not reach the fender or stick out) but its a fat lip.
The negative camber is about -3 (baby camber). Even with a proper wheel alinment its nothing. My car is lowered and dose not rub.
I have 18x9.5 +35 on stock tires (225/45/18) its not flush (dose not reach the fender or stick out) but its a fat lip.
The negative camber is about -3 (baby camber). Even with a proper wheel alinment its nothing. My car is lowered and dose not rub.