Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Which would u pick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-01-2010 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
yiksing's Avatar
Thread Starter
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Which would u pick?

Enkei RP03

18x8@20.2 lbs vs 18x9@18.3 lbs
Old 05-01-2010 | 12:23 PM
  #2  
thebiggdaddy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
I don't think that's a hard decision. The 18 x 9's are lighter and wider, which are both great for people who like to track. Also, it would look better.
Old 05-01-2010 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
Pico's Avatar
It's Complicated
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerz
Go wider- makes for a more aggressive look
Old 05-01-2010 | 06:44 PM
  #4  
J wind's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by yiksing
Enkei RP03

18x8@20.2 lbs vs 18x9@18.3 lbs

Is that right? I mean, 18x8, the smaller size, is actually heavier then the wider 18x9?
Old 05-01-2010 | 07:54 PM
  #5  
yiksing's Avatar
Thread Starter
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
yup, the wider one is actually lighter... weird huh.
Old 05-01-2010 | 08:35 PM
  #6  
Brian Major's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
9...
Old 05-02-2010 | 12:53 AM
  #7  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
i would do more research.

and figure out how more is less.

beers
Old 05-02-2010 | 12:55 AM
  #8  
Chad D.'s Avatar
Spinnnnnnnnnnn
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 2
From: Windsor, Ontario
Originally Posted by thebiggdaddy
I don't think that's a hard decision. The 18 x 9's are lighter and wider, which are both great for people who like to track. Also, it would look better.
/\hard to argue that.
Old 05-02-2010 | 01:31 AM
  #9  
Endless Rotaries's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
You have to get the 18x9, there's no question about it. 18x8 is totally pointless and is a flatter face to boot. In fact the optimal setup would be the 18x9.5 +38 imho. i just did an 8 with that setup and 275/35 all around.

The wider one can often be lighter. A lot has to do with the amount of material is used to produce the back pad. Wheels with HI Disk and LO Disk are an example of this weight difference. you see this a lot in Multipiece wheels for big brake kit clearance. Most consumers don't realize this but most one piece wheels that have staggered fitments also have this "hi" pad and "lo" pad built into their offsets per say.

ergo: An RP03 18x9 +40 is going to be lighter than 18x9 +18. Same width just different offset. With the 18x8, it's a flatter face making for a thicker back pad. The 18x9 being more concave allows for a thinner backpad thereby reducing the weight. The additional material required to make the rim wider is negligible in comparison to the weight consumed by the spoke architecture and back pad of the wheel.

Rishie

Last edited by Endless Rotaries; 05-02-2010 at 01:34 AM.
Old 05-02-2010 | 01:38 AM
  #10  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Endless Rotaries
You have to get the 18x9, there's no question about it. 18x8 is totally pointless and is a flatter face to boot. In fact the optimal setup would be the 18x9.5 +38 imho. i just did an 8 with that setup and 275/35 all around.

The wider one can often be lighter. A lot has to do with the amount of material is used to produce the back pad. Wheels with HI Disk and LO Disk are an example of this weight difference. you see this a lot in Multipiece wheels for big brake kit clearance. Most consumers don't realize this but most one piece wheels that have staggered fitments also have this "hi" pad and "lo" pad built into their offsets per say.

ergo: An RP03 18x9 +40 is going to be lighter than 18x9 +18. Same width just different offset. With the 18x8, it's a flatter face making for a thicker back pad. The 18x9 being more concave allows for a thinner backpad thereby reducing the weight. The additional material required to make the rim wider is negligible in comparison to the weight consumed by the spoke architecture and back pad of the wheel.

Rishie
there you go,

google came to you!

but the real answer depends on what you are going to do with it. and how much talent you have.

beers
Old 05-02-2010 | 03:31 AM
  #11  
yiksing's Avatar
Thread Starter
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Ty Endless Rotaries for the detailed reply and swoope for the stuff that he does best.
Old 05-02-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #12  
J wind's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
Wow, so the wider the rim, the lighter it is in some cases huh? Mind=blown lol.

Not to thread jack here...

but from what I can see, you'll get a more contact with the road, so more grip, which is great. Albeit wouldn't having a wider tire more then make up the difference in weight?

Also, how would 18x8.5 38os be for track use? I would think that because it sticks out a bit more, it would somehow add more unsprung weight. I'm still researching this myself, so I figured I'll ask here anyways lol.
Old 05-02-2010 | 08:52 AM
  #13  
Never L8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: Crystal Lake, Illinois
Originally Posted by Endless Rotaries
You have to get the 18x9, there's no question about it. 18x8 is totally pointless and is a flatter face to boot. In fact the optimal setup would be the 18x9.5 +38 imho. i just did an 8 with that setup and 275/35 all around.

The wider one can often be lighter. A lot has to do with the amount of material is used to produce the back pad. Wheels with HI Disk and LO Disk are an example of this weight difference. you see this a lot in Multipiece wheels for big brake kit clearance. Most consumers don't realize this but most one piece wheels that have staggered fitments also have this "hi" pad and "lo" pad built into their offsets per say.

ergo: An RP03 18x9 +40 is going to be lighter than 18x9 +18. Same width just different offset. With the 18x8, it's a flatter face making for a thicker back pad. The 18x9 being more concave allows for a thinner backpad thereby reducing the weight. The additional material required to make the rim wider is negligible in comparison to the weight consumed by the spoke architecture and back pad of the wheel.

Rishie
Damn...close the thread! You got your answer.
Old 05-06-2010 | 02:09 PM
  #14  
BRODA's Avatar
Not yet famous
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 5
From: MA
FYI... The 18x9 +40 RP03 is actually 19.95 lbs. That said, they do look great.

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=625
Old 05-06-2010 | 02:13 PM
  #15  
Huey52's Avatar
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 6
From: New England
18x9.5 +38 RP03

Go big or go home.
Old 05-06-2010 | 02:18 PM
  #16  
HockeyRX-8's Avatar
TNC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Shaolin, NY
^+1
Old 05-14-2010 | 09:11 AM
  #17  
yiksing's Avatar
Thread Starter
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Just thought I should post the specs for those interested.

Sorry to resurrect this dead thread.
Attached Thumbnails Which would u pick?-specs.jpg  
Old 05-14-2010 | 10:31 AM
  #18  
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 1
From: Bend, OR
Originally Posted by yiksing
Just thought I should post the specs for those interested.

Sorry to resurrect this dead thread.
Dead thread = 10 days old? Hmm...

Anyways, that's nice that the manufacturer lists the weight, but I'd rather trust a forum member who weighed the wheel in person.
Old 05-15-2010 | 08:31 PM
  #19  
vesper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: McMinnville, Oregon
I'll probably be getting these wheels (18x9.5 38) in a few paychecks, I'll measure them then.

-Vesper
Old 05-17-2010 | 05:38 AM
  #20  
yiksing's Avatar
Thread Starter
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Originally Posted by vesper
I'll probably be getting these wheels (18x9.5 38) in a few paychecks, I'll measure them then.

-Vesper
That would be nice, I myself am waiting for a quote from local supplier and wanna be sure i'm getting the lightest one i can.
Old 05-17-2010 | 05:41 AM
  #21  
vesper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: McMinnville, Oregon
I'lll post weights when I get them. As I said though, it'll probably be a month or so until I order them, then however long it takes to get them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tbiggybig
RX-8 Discussion
35
07-14-2022 07:14 PM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 06:16 PM
200.mph
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
462
12-10-2018 04:49 PM
yurcivicsux
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
192
09-12-2017 11:54 PM
xAgyex
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
0
09-28-2015 09:54 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.