Series II ECU Tuning
#926
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
no one is going to just up and give Steve a copy of ME. Personal edition is married to your laptop and VIN.
If you're suggesting someone is going to buy the Pro version for him then see my first sentence.
You could always ship your laptop to him once you've gone thru the antiquated pairing process with epifan.
Elaborate?
If you're suggesting someone is going to buy the Pro version for him then see my first sentence.
You could always ship your laptop to him once you've gone thru the antiquated pairing process with epifan.
He will likley be tuning two turbo RX-8's with the Adaptronic soon.
#927
Well, after using versatune for the past week, I can report that it is awesome. Since I have not used mazdaedit I cannot compare the two, so I won't try. I will say that the UI of versatune is awesome, flashing is a breeze, and Steve is great to work with. The beta version I am testing has had very few issues (parameter labeling) and seems to have been sufficiently bench tested to remove posibilty of screwing up customers cars/ecu's. This is going to be an AWESOME option for people looking to tune their cars!
#929
Registered
iTrader: (15)
Glad they finally got on board. I helped them out with ECU dumps early in the development but they completely dropped communications with me after a while. Their interface was great and a heck of a lot more user friendly than ME. That being said, ME hasn't let me down yet with its capabilities.
#930
I'm glad to hear Versatuner is still going, but their lack of communication lead me to bite the bullet and buy ME, though only the personal version. I haven't had any real issues with ME so far, apart from the obvious UI inadequacies. Honestly, I've been pleasantly surprised with the functionality and stability of the program, given the rather amateurish GUI appearance. I've also had much better support from the russian than I was expecting. Looks are important, but I feel like Versatuner is going to have to be substantially superior to entice me to buy at this point.
#932
Glad they finally got on board. I helped them out with ECU dumps early in the development but they completely dropped communications with me after a while. Their interface was great and a heck of a lot more user friendly than ME. That being said, ME hasn't let me down yet with its capabilities.
#934
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
[12:38:45.724] Read DTCs from module: Engine
[12:38:45.771] Read DTCs from module: Transmission
[12:38:46.348] // error: can: no response
[12:38:46.348] // error: unable to read DTC response 07E9
[12:38:46.348] Read DTCs from module: AWD
[12:38:46.925] // error: can: no response
[12:38:46.925] // error: unable to read DTC response 0769
[12:38:46.925] Read DTCs from module: ABS
[12:38:47.502] // error: can: no response
[12:38:47.502] // error: unable to read DTC response 0768
[12:38:47.502] Read DTCs from module: RCM
[12:38:48.080] // error: can: no response
[12:38:48.080] // error: unable to read DTC response 073F
[12:38:48.080] Read DTCs from module: TPM
[12:38:48.080] // error: can: invalid cmd response
[12:38:48.080] // error: unable to read DTC response 0700
[12:38:48.080] Read current DTCs
[12:38:48.126] Read historical DTCs
[12:38:48.142] Read historical DTC
[12:38:48.719] // error: can: no response
[12:38:48.719] // error: unable to read DTC response
Back to S1, I changed the Fan on Temp and Nothing else, this is what I get when I use Mazda's Gen 1 Logger. Is that normal ?
I mean I know this car doesnt have TPM AWD, but just hope I did everything right
[12:38:45.771] Read DTCs from module: Transmission
[12:38:46.348] // error: can: no response
[12:38:46.348] // error: unable to read DTC response 07E9
[12:38:46.348] Read DTCs from module: AWD
[12:38:46.925] // error: can: no response
[12:38:46.925] // error: unable to read DTC response 0769
[12:38:46.925] Read DTCs from module: ABS
[12:38:47.502] // error: can: no response
[12:38:47.502] // error: unable to read DTC response 0768
[12:38:47.502] Read DTCs from module: RCM
[12:38:48.080] // error: can: no response
[12:38:48.080] // error: unable to read DTC response 073F
[12:38:48.080] Read DTCs from module: TPM
[12:38:48.080] // error: can: invalid cmd response
[12:38:48.080] // error: unable to read DTC response 0700
[12:38:48.080] Read current DTCs
[12:38:48.126] Read historical DTCs
[12:38:48.142] Read historical DTC
[12:38:48.719] // error: can: no response
[12:38:48.719] // error: unable to read DTC response
Back to S1, I changed the Fan on Temp and Nothing else, this is what I get when I use Mazda's Gen 1 Logger. Is that normal ?
I mean I know this car doesnt have TPM AWD, but just hope I did everything right
Last edited by nycgps; 03-15-2014 at 11:43 PM.
#936
launch control would be pretty cool. Shooting flames off a 2-step is always awesome to see
#937
#939
Should be on the market really soon. He just emailed me wondering if this final version I'm using is ready to go on the market. And it is, so i assume it will be for sale very soon.
#940
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Bump!
Go to the Group Buy link and Sign Up. Mazda Edit and Versatune (New Release will have series 2 RX8) can be covered as needed. MS3, MS6, WRX, and STI can be included as well.
https://www.rx8club.com/group-buy-ce...eattle-251516/
I'll let Ro_t8 comment as needed.
Go to the Group Buy link and Sign Up. Mazda Edit and Versatune (New Release will have series 2 RX8) can be covered as needed. MS3, MS6, WRX, and STI can be included as well.
https://www.rx8club.com/group-buy-ce...eattle-251516/
I'll let Ro_t8 comment as needed.
#943
#945
also Steve created a "valet" tune that he wanted me to test that had rev and speed limiters as well as drastically decreased power.
#946
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
First thing I did was increase oiling slightly, lowered the fan on temp, and am currently working on maf scaling. I do have a tune that I am working on a little bit at a time to help with how rich my oem tune was. I know the importance of sensor scaling first before adjusting other parameters, but I couldn't help myself because I wanted to verify that it actually worked, and also because its nice to not be so rich under hard acceleration.
also Steve created a "valet" tune that he wanted me to test that had rev and speed limiters as well as drastically decreased power.
also Steve created a "valet" tune that he wanted me to test that had rev and speed limiters as well as drastically decreased power.
FWIW : I just tuned a S2 using M/E (NA)........ no problems .Now that I've done that I'm very confident I could make it work on a turbo S2 as well .
Grey line : pre tune was running lean due to aftermarket intake throwing off the fuel trims.
Green line : Fuel trims normalised
Red Line : New tune .... needs minor tweaking still but pretty much there on the first iteration.
Last edited by Brettus; 03-27-2014 at 06:44 PM.
#947
Looks nice. Is that a wot run? If no, what percent throttle position? My cars oem tune definitely didn't have that lean issue. It was between 11:1 and 10.5:1 In the higher rpm range at wot.